Fiorano ESB vs Red Hat Fuse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fiorano Logo
392 views|240 comparisons
Red Hat Logo
4,838 views|2,450 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus).
To learn more, read our detailed ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code.""The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation.""One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."

More Fiorano ESB Pros →

"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse.""What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive.""The initial setup process is quite straightforward.""I found it was quite easy to set up and implement.""Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly.""The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful.""With a premium, one can get support 24 hours.""The stability has been good."

More Red Hat Fuse Pros →

Cons
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality.""Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places.""Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."

More Fiorano ESB Cons →

"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation.""My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive.""In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall.""The solution will be discontinued in 2024.""For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella.""The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved.""As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced.""The web tools need to be updated."

More Red Hat Fuse Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Fiorano ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We found other solutions were more costly."
  • "This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
  • "After doing some Googling and comparisons, the main standouts were MuleSoft and Red Hat Fuse. One of the big factors in our decision to go with Fuse was the licensing cost. It was cheaper to go with Fuse."
  • "Pricing has been something that we have been working with Red Hat on, year over year. We have preferred pricing with the university because we are involved in education and research."
  • "This is an expensive product. It costs a lot and although it's worth the money, the explanations that we need to give to our top executives are highly complicated."
  • "The most important feature of Fuse is the cost. It is open source and a cheap option for an ESB. So, most of the clients in the Middle East and Asian countries prefer this ESB. Other ESBs, like MuleSoft and IBM API Connect, are pretty expensive. Because it is open source, Red Hat Fuse is the cheapest solution, providing almost every integration capability."
  • "My company pays for the license of Red Hat Fuse yearly. At the end of the day, it's a low-cost solution, and its support licenses are still very decently priced versus bigger operators such as IBM, etc. Red Hat Fuse is much more affordable than other solutions. On a scale of one to five, with one being cheap and five being extremely expensive, I'm rating its pricing a one."
  • "Red Hat Fuse is an expensive tool, though I cannot answer how much it costs as that's confidential."
  • More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation.
    Top Answer:Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement.
    Top Answer:The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful.
    Top Answer:You need to pay for the license. It's not free. I'm not aware of the exact prices. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing since it is a subscription-based solution.
    Top Answer:I haven't experienced the online part of Red Hat Fuse. Red Hat Fuse doesn't have a lot of administrative control like other applications. Using administrative control, the operational user can view… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    392
    Comparisons
    240
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    200
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    4,838
    Comparisons
    2,450
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    601
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuse ESB, FuseSource
    Learn More
    Overview
    The Fiorano ESB implements a brokered, peer-to-peer (often referred to as super peer) system architecture, which combines the management benefits of centralized hub-and-spoke systems with the performance benefits of fully distributed peer-to-peer systems, while avoiding the particular disadvantages of both of these individual approaches.

    Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

    Sample Customers
    Polaris Transport, Harris Exelis, Aboitiz Power, Dyckerhoff AG, Gamma-Dynacare, DHL, Bajaj Finserv, Ecole hételire de Lausanne, Northern California Power Agency, Federal Bank, Commercial Bank of Africa, EasyPay, SSP, General American Corporation, Forex, Beijing Shubei Software Technology, City of Canton, Kent County Council, SJS District, County of Tulare, US Coast Guard, ZUNYI, Fraikin, Nilkamal, Posco, Toyota, UB Group
    Avianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm49%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Media Company7%
    Retailer7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 5 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 23 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods Integration Server.

    See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.

    We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.