We performed a comparison between Fiorano ESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus)."The ability to compliment out-of-the-box integration components with small custom code."
"The platform's most valuable feature is data transformation."
"One of the most valuable features is the scalability. Whenever it's required, we can add more servers and scale. We can actually use specific servers for specific stuff. Unlike in other solutions, now we can implement one server purely dedicated to core-banking-related API. This is very important when it comes to the PCI DSS certification."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."
"The initial setup process is quite straightforward."
"I found it was quite easy to set up and implement."
"Because we have been doing Red Hat Fuse projects for three years, and over time we have matured, we can employ similar use cases and make use of accelerators or templates. It gives us an edge when we deliver these services or APIs quickly."
"The process workflow, where we can orchestrate and design the application by defining different routes, is really useful."
"With a premium, one can get support 24 hours."
"The stability has been good."
"Fiorano ESB could be improved by becoming more user-friendly. Most of the pages and generated reports on API usage are already there, but they could be more user-friendly. There could be more selections added to generate reports. Overall, though, Fiorano suits all our needs and has good functionality."
"Error logging is not very user-friendly. It requires the error logging to be configured in many different places."
"Fiorano ESB's logging feature and data availability need improvement."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"My company doesn't have any experience with other messaging tools, so it's difficult to mention what areas could be improved in Red Hat Fuse, but it could be pricing because I find it expensive."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."
"For improvement, they can consider the way we collaborate with other applications...Right now, in Red Hat Fuse, everything is not available under one umbrella."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."
"The web tools need to be updated."
Fiorano ESB is ranked 10th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 5 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) with 23 reviews. Fiorano ESB is rated 9.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fiorano ESB writes "Scalable and easy to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Fiorano ESB is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) vendors.
We monitor all ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.