We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare FireEye Email Security vs. SonicWall Email Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Email Security vs. SonicWall Email Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is doing its work. It is doing what it was actually designed to do. It has ensured we don't have business email compromises, and it has also ensured that our brand Galaxy is unique all year round.""I love the Advanced Malware Protection feature. It works very well... The appliance has more security such as SDF, DKIM, DMARC, and encryption.""It has the ability to tell us, after an email has been delivered, where else it went, once it got inside. Maybe it's something we wanted it to stop and it didn't stop it, but it notified us later that it was something that it should have stopped. It can give us a trajectory of all the other places that it went internally and it can tell us what files were transferred as well.""Cisco Secure Email Cloud Gateway has allowed our users to be able to concentrate on the emails that they do receive. Previously, our users had to deal with nine million additional emails across the organization, which is nearly 1,000 emails per user to have to deal with a month. That's a massive amount for our staff to deal with and probably several hours of their time. We have a lot of clinical staff, being a hospital. We want to make our staff as productive as possible. By removing a lot of that spam and phishing type emails, this allows them to do their job.""The filtering is definitely better at catching both spam and malicious messages, and there's a lot of extremely granular ability for setting up rules. You can do it the way you want to. The Microsoft solution tends to be pretty limited in how it allows some of that to be done.""Anti-Spam and Advanced Malware Protection are the most valuable features... and we also have the option to block Zero-day attacks.""It does a great job of preventing spam, malware, and ransomware. I can only go by what people have told me and what I've seen, but I have not seen spam in a year and a half to two years in my own company mailbox. And there are not a lot of catches where it's catching something that should have gotten through, either.""The malicious URL scanning, as well as the anti-malware features, have been really useful for us in our environment."

More Cisco Secure Email Pros »

"The auto-remediation feature is valuable.""What I find most valuable with the solution is that it can integrate with cloud solutions, such as Google and Microsoft. Additionally, the solution is easy to use.""The product helps reduce the number of malicious emails reaching the user's inbox.""FireEye is good for malware depicting and security.""We can control this solution from the cloud and are able to access it from wherever we are."

More FireEye Email Security Pros »

"The most valuable features are the anti-spam, anti-phishing, anti-virus, and anti-spoofing.""This solution provides very good email security that protects us against spamming and malware."

More SonicWall Email Security Pros »

Cons
"Typically, in a phishing email, they try to use a name everybody's going to recognize, like the CEO's name or the CFO's name... With this appliance, the way it's designed at the moment, for us to really stop that with any level of confidence, we have to build a dictionary of all the names of the people we want it to check, and all the ways they could be spelled. My name would be in there as Phillip Collins, Phillip D. Collins, Phillip Dean Collins, Phil Collins, Phil D. Collins. There could be eight or 10 variations of my name that we'd have to put in the dictionary. There's no artificial intelligence to say "Phil Collins" could be all these other things, and to stop phishing from coming through in that way.""The UI is definitely one area of improvement because it doesn't match other interfaces and the navigation can be a little clunky.""We have been struggling in the last month with Cisco encryption and with the S/MIME encryption. I don't know if it is an issue on our side or if these features of the solution are not working very well.""I use the search all the time. Sometimes, it is hard to search for things and things are hard to find. People come to me all the time, saying, "This email didn't get through." Then, I go searching and don't find it on the first search. You have to think about alternative searches. I don't know if there is an easier way that they could help to find things. I don't know how they could simplify it, because now everybody else is using the cloud and everything is coming from Office 365, or whatever. It is just not the same environment from years ago where everybody had their own server and you could search easier.""The interface is dated. It has looked pretty much the same for 15 years or so. It would be helpful to be able to do everything from one spot. The centralized quarantine and reporting are completely separate from policy administration.""The area of license renewal should be improved. We normally renew our license every year. There is a feature called smart licensing, and I switched from the legacy mode to the smart licensing mode because of what I thought smart licensing does. I thought it would make licensing renewal seamless and very swift, but ever since I've switched to smart licensing, each time I want to renew my license, it is a whole lot of headache. The process is not smooth, and I had to keep calling Cisco TAC to see how the issue can be resolved. At one point, I wanted to revert back to the legacy mode, but I can't revert. Once you switch from the legacy mode to the smart licensing mode, you can't revert. They should improve on the visibility of the smart licensing mode so that it can indeed be smart and easier to use for the license renewal every year. That is one challenge.""The reporting functionality needs to be improved.""We have Microsoft and we have the E5 licenses, they have more EDR responses on certain emails. That's something that Cisco ESA on the cloud doesn't have. They don't do anything about MITRE attacks. They only detect if there is a malicious email or a threat and they remove it."

More Cisco Secure Email Cons »

"I would like the solution to be able to automatically quarantine the malicious emails before getting to the user's mailbox and continue with regular email operations. This could result in the user clicking the email before the purge operation is completed.""The custom tailoring is limited.""The spam detection feature could be better.""If they want to be the primary or best solution, they need to have better email management features.""The solution needs better support."

More FireEye Email Security Cons »

"A lot of spoofed emails are still coming to the end-user, so the configuration for this option needs to be improved.""We would like to see more information on a dashboard about what is happening when it comes to spamming and malware."

More SonicWall Email Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service.""The licensing was all transferred.""Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco.""At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of discounts, and that is why we are still with them. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""There are additional fees for adding features."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The solution requires a license to be purchased for every user.""The licensing is on a yearly basis."

More FireEye Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have a two-year license subscription and the price is very high."

More SonicWall Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The added value of it is that every migration to a new version is initiated by the Cisco version itself, so that is a… more »
Top Answer: We have Microsoft and we have the E5 licenses, they have more EDR responses on certain emails. That's something that… more »
Top Answer: FireEye is good for malware depicting and security.
Top Answer: If they want to be as primary or best solution, they need to have better email management features. SMTP handling is… more »
Top Answer: I used the solution as a secondary security assessment gateway.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Dell SonicWALL Email Security Platform, SonicWall Hosted Email Security
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

FireEye Email Security delivers dynamic defense to detect attacks from the very first time they're seen and blocks the most dangerous cyber threats including malware-laden attachments and URLs, credential phishing sites and business email compromise attacks. Email-borne cyber attacks are targeted, automated and hidden amongst millions of messages, easily morphing before signatures can be created.

SonicWALL Email Security Platform offers powerful protection to keep email threats out. And sensitive data in. With innovative protection techniques for both inbound and outbound email plus unique management tools, the Email Security platform delivers superior email protection today while standing ready to stop the new attacks of tomorrow.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about FireEye Email Security
Learn more about SonicWall Email Security
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Northshore Utility District, Luz Technologies, Air Academy Federal Credit Union, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, State of Missouri, City and County of San Francisco, Denver Public Schools, Vodafone, Go Auto, Stater Bros. Market
Star Kay White, Locala Community Partnerships
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Retailer14%
Financial Services Firm10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company23%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider24%
Government10%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company19%
University14%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Email Security vs. SonicWall Email Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FireEye Email Security is ranked 12th in Email Security with 5 reviews while SonicWall Email Security is ranked 21st in Email Security with 2 reviews. FireEye Email Security is rated 8.0, while SonicWall Email Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of FireEye Email Security writes "Easy to set up with good stability and great anti-spam features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Email Security writes "An important component of our secure network that protects us against spam and malware". FireEye Email Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection, Fortinet FortiMail, Forcepoint Email Security and DMARC Compass, whereas SonicWall Email Security is most compared with Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Proofpoint Email Protection, Fortinet FortiMail and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. See our FireEye Email Security vs. SonicWall Email Security report.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.