We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The most valuable features are the reports."
"It is easy to manage."
"I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"EDR's most valuable feature is its basic protection from malware and viruses."
"Provides web and DNS protection over https."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We can scale the solution."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The agents are easy to deploy."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"Provides protection against threats."
"The stability has been great."
"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."
"Detections could be improved."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution is not stable."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could improve some issues and add new security files."
"The system can be heavy, slowing down performance."
"Could include some additional protection."
"It consumes many system resources."
"The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well."
"We would like to have better strategic information."
"We'd like to see them improve the automatic response."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
"The price of McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"The customization capabilities of the solution are an area where it lacks, so it would be great if our company could customize the solution to meet the demands of our customers."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 17th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 48 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Intercept X Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.