Compare FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText eDiscovery

FireEye Endpoint Security is ranked 9th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while OpenText eDiscovery is ranked 2nd in eDiscovery with 3 reviews. FireEye Endpoint Security is rated 7.4, while OpenText eDiscovery is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of FireEye Endpoint Security writes "A simple to use, yet effective solution for protecting us against malware and other threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText eDiscovery writes "It is used as a forensic tool and End point Security that takes an image, extracts the data and then analyzes the keyword search besides providing Security for the Enterprise network". FireEye Endpoint Security is most compared with CrowdStrike, Darktrace and Carbon Black CB Defense, whereas OpenText eDiscovery is most compared with AccessData FTK, Nuix eDiscovery and Tanium. See our FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText eDiscovery report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the integration between environments.The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow.The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful.The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity.It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware.

Read more »

The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use.It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts.Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see simple processing and reporting online.They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input.If you have another endpoint product running on the same machine, you have to fine tune functions from FireEye to avoid performance and user experience issues.The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better.I hope the solution can be used in cloud systems going forward.

Read more »

We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow.There were minor UI bugs.I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before.It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years.

Read more »

We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution.We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution.EnCase is an affordable solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,375
Comparisons
2,676
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
399
Avg. Rating
7.3
2nd
out of 46 in eDiscovery
Views
4,114
Comparisons
2,685
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
379
Avg. Rating
7.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
EnCase
Learn
FireEye
OpenText
Overview

FireEye Endpoint Security is an integrated endpoint solution that detects, prevents and responds effectively to known malware and threats traditional anti-virus endpoint security products miss. It expands endpoint visibility and provides contextual frontline intelligence to help analysts automate protection, quickly determine the exact scope and level of any attack activity and adapt defenses as needed.

EnCase Endpoint Security enables earlier detection, faster decisions and unprecedented threat response. Real-time continuous monitoring and newly integrated threat intelligence instantly analyzes and responds to would-be threats. Redefining the user experience with its redesigned user interface that is deliberate and intended to enhance the security users' end-to-end experience. Enriched and contextualized endpoint data, reported as Threat Scores, allow users to quickly focus on suspicious activities without analyzing all telemetry. It Create events, collect endpoint data, initiate scans, remediate, and more from third party security tools using open APIs.

Offer
Learn more about FireEye Endpoint Security
Learn more about OpenText eDiscovery
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company23%
Government18%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Government12%
Security Firm9%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
407,096 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.