We performed a comparison between OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, kCura and others in eDiscovery."The solution is very stable."
"It indexes much faster, and is more reflexive because of the Enscripts."
"Data Recovery: Its ability to repair damaged partitions and uncover hidden partitions from within the tool, and allow further analysis."
"It speeds up the process, so I can meet my deadlines."
"The technical support is excellent."
"The most important feature we've found is the Enscripts. That is one powerful feature that I, personally, love to use."
"I like the processing feature on the product because it does everything at once, i.e, indexing, recovery, keyword searches, etc."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Provides protection against threats."
"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"The seamless deployment is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"It is a really strong solution for endpoint security."
"The installation phase of the solution was very easy."
"We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email."
"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better."
"Sometimes the application can take more time to complete the image processing or fail at the end of the process."
"There were minor UI bugs."
"I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function."
"In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."
"Ease of use and learning curve need improvement."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"The solution needs to work on memory consumption. It is too high."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 4th in eDiscovery with 8 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 17th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 46 reviews. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 7.8, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "A stable and scalable hybrid solution with easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with Nuix eDiscovery, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, kCura Relativity and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.
We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.