Compare FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program.""The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.""It doesn't impact the devices. It is an agent-based solution, and we see no performance knock on cell phones. That was a big thing for us, especially in the mobile world. We don't see battery degradation like you do with other solutions which really drain the battery, as they're constantly doing things. That can shorten the useful life of a device."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity.""The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow.""The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful.""The most valuable feature is the integration between environments.""The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features.""FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front."

More FireEye Endpoint Security Pros »

"The solution is very stable."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration.""The technical support is very slow.""I would recommend that the solution offer more availability in terms of the product portfolio and integration with third-party products."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"The integration and display of the dashboards have to be done better.""They could also increase or improve the scalability because to my knowledge the biggest bandwidth can only support up to 10 gigs of input.""If you have another endpoint product running on the same machine, you have to fine tune functions from FireEye to avoid performance and user experience issues.""I would like to see simple processing and reporting online.""The Linux support is very poor. I use base detection. Currently, they are providing malware protection and logon track features in Windows and Mac. These features aren't available in Linux. It will be helpful to extend these capabilities to Linux. We would also like assets grouping and device lock protection features, which are included in their roadmap.""The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."

More FireEye Endpoint Security Cons »

"The reporting is a bit unreliable. It needs to be better.""We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email.""In the past, incident response time for tech support was slow."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before.""It is a yearly subscription-based product, which includes the license and hardware. There is also a subscription for technical support up to five years."

More FireEye Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution.""We have a license. And, we found the cost high. We contacted them and talked to them about the ratio of the US dollar versus the Indian rupee and then we came to a solution."

More OpenText EnCase eDiscovery Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Among the most valuable features are the exclusions. And on the scalability side, we can integrate well with the SIEM… more »
Top Answer: We use the MSP model, so we're able to pay as we go. We report usage based on the actual usage, which is very handy. The… more »
Top Answer: Like any other security tool, there's always rooms for improvement. Some of the ways the product can be improved are: -… more »
Top Answer: FireEye Endpoint Security's scalability is awesome. I think it is one of the best on that front.
Top Answer: If you compare your solution without the antivirus solution, and the price of the agent, it is a little bit expensive… more »
Top Answer: In my personal and professional view, I think the reports need more development. They need more details on the reports… more »
Top Answer: The solution is very stable.
Top Answer: We find the pricing to be quite reasonable. It's not the most expensive on the market.
Top Answer: Overall, the features on offer are fine and I don't see a place for improvement in that respect. The technical support… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Secure Endpoint
EnCase eDiscovery
Learn More
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

FireEye Endpoint Security is an integrated endpoint solution that detects, prevents and responds effectively to known malware and threats traditional anti-virus endpoint security products miss. It expands endpoint visibility and provides contextual frontline intelligence to help analysts automate protection, quickly determine the exact scope and level of any attack activity and adapt defenses as needed.

eDiscovery collection tools address the rise in dispersed and remote workforces, the proliferation of mobile devices and new sources of data. Comprehensively collecting data across all data sources, including endpoints, such as desktops and laptops, is critical to defensibility. Collection analytics and culling is key to efficient digital investigations, narrowing the document collection to drive down the cost of legal review.

With OpenText™ EnCase™ eDiscovery, organizations can streamline the collection, culling and preservation of data across diverse sources in a single efficient process.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about FireEye Endpoint Security
Learn more about OpenText EnCase eDiscovery
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Ontario Ministry of Government, Aerospace Company, Chesterfield Police Department
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider27%
Computer Software Company22%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FireEye Endpoint Security is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is ranked 3rd in eDiscovery with 2 reviews. FireEye Endpoint Security is rated 8.4, while OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of FireEye Endpoint Security writes "A simple to use, yet effective solution for protecting us against malware and other threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText EnCase eDiscovery writes "It is used as a forensic tool and End point Security that takes an image, extracts the data and then analyzes the keyword search besides providing Security for the Enterprise network". FireEye Endpoint Security is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Carbon Black CB Defense and Tanium, whereas OpenText EnCase eDiscovery is most compared with AccessData FTK, Nuix eDiscovery, kCura Relativity, Recommind Axcelerate eDiscovery and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our FireEye Endpoint Security vs. OpenText EnCase eDiscovery report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.