Trellix Advanced Threat Defense vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection).
To learn more, read our detailed ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
HossamSelim
Archie Scorgie
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module.""Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server.""It is very scalable.""It is stable and reliable.""It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business.""Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pros →

"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.""The most valuable feature is the view into the application.""We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up.""The solution can scale.""The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.""Very functional and good for detecting malicious traffic.""Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security.""The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

Cons
"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version.""This solution needs to be made "cloud ready".""Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet.""The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign.""We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats.""I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Cons →

"It is an expensive solution.""Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement.""The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit.""FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically.""Technical packaging could be improved.""The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this.""Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.""Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become accustomed to the system, it becomes easier to use."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."
  • "Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."
  • More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product offers good pricing. It was not very expensive.
    Top Answer:The scalability could be better. We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats. In sandboxing, the time to respond is slower than we would like. We'd like them to be able to process… more »
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    832
    Comparisons
    576
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    548
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,032
    Comparisons
    1,439
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Powerful advanced threat detection

    Uncover Hidden Threats

    Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

    Threat Intelligence Sharing

    Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

    Enable Investigation

    Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Sample Customers
    The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government12%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Government10%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    ATP (Advanced Threat Protection)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 21st in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 7 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 14th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 35 reviews. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is rated 7.6, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense writes "Easy to set up and use with a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox and Microsoft Defender for Identity, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiGate, Zscaler Internet Access and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

    See our list of best ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) vendors.

    We monitor all ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.