Compare FireEye Network Security vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM)

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Network Security vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.""The server appliance is good.""The most valuable feature is the network security module.""It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.""It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye.""I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."

More FireEye Network Security Pros »

"It's fully scalable. There is no limit. Of course, the license limits per day the number of terabytes. In my opinion, it's very flexible.""The most valuable features are the packet decoder, log decoder, and concentrator.""The most valuable feature is that we can create our own connectors for any application, and NetWitness provides the training and tools to do it.""The most valuable features are the integration and ease of use.""Performance and reporting are very good.""The most valuable features are the threat prediction and network forensics.""The most valuable feature is the security that it provides.""What we are mainly using are the RSA concentrator, RSA Decoder, Archiver, Broker, and Log Decoder."

More RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) Pros »

Cons
"It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto.""Technical packaging could be improved.""It is very expensive, the price could be better.""I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet.""Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone.""They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules."

More FireEye Network Security Cons »

"They should implement algorithms to digest that data and produce additional, more advanced reporting, alerting and support of internal security teams.""Log aggregation is an issue with this solution because there are a huge number of alerts in a single instance.""The initial setup is very complex and should be simplified.""The documentation is not as structured as I would like, personally, and I think that it can be improved and made much more user-friendly.""The user interface is a little bit difficult for new users and it needs to be improved.""Lots of competing products have vulnerability protection built into their products, and this solution would be improved by including that support.""It is not so easy to customize this product.""Security needs improvement."

More RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive.""It's an expensive solution.""Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

More FireEye Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment.""Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day.""Our license is for one year."

More RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature… more »
Top Answer: Its price is a bit high. A small customer cannot buy it. Its licensing is on a yearly basis.
Top Answer: Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation… more »
Top Answer: It would help if they could provide the malware analytics in the core package as that would make the cost more reasonable. Licensing is paid annually and I believe the cost is somewhere between 12,000… more »
Top Answer: I believe they could improve their support, there are often delays. The price of the solution could be reduced, it's very costly.
Ranking
Views
7,143
Comparisons
4,857
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
442
Rating
8.4
Views
6,414
Comparisons
4,227
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
502
Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FireEye
RSA Security Analytics
Learn More
Overview

FireEye Network Security is an advanced threat protection and breach detection platform that provides industry leading threat visibility and protection against the world’s most sophisticated and damaging attacks. By leveraging FireEye’s unique technologies and threat intelligence, FireEye Network Security detects what other security solutions miss, providing holistic security from the perimeter to the network core.

If you’re relying on log data to detect and prevent cyber threats, you’re in trouble. Attackers increasingly evade detection of log-centric security and network monitoring tools. But logs combined with full packet, endpoint NetFlow data are proven to provide the essential details for early threat detection. Here’s a closer look at our solution.

Offer
Learn more about FireEye Network Security
Learn more about RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM)
Sample Customers
FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Los Angeles World Airports, Reply
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
University14%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider30%
Financial Services Firm30%
Computer Software Company20%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business39%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise36%
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye Network Security vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,521 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FireEye Network Security is ranked 4th in Advanced Threat Protection with 5 reviews while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection with 11 reviews. FireEye Network Security is rated 8.6, while RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FireEye Network Security writes "A reliable and complete network protection solution that protects from signature-based and signature-less attacks and has powerful logging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) writes "Good support, powerful decoders and concentrator, but the dashboard is not reflecting events in real-time ". FireEye Network Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Stealthwatch, Check Point SandBlast Network and Zscaler Cloud Sandbox, whereas RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, RSA enVision and Cisco Stealthwatch. See our FireEye Network Security vs. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.