SafeBreach vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SafeBreach and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Archie Scorgie
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods.""The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."

More SafeBreach Pros →

"The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.""The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security.""If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.""The installation phase was easy.""The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.""The product is very easy to configure.""Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams.""The most valuable feature is the network security module."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

Cons
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable.""I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."

More SafeBreach Cons →

"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required.""It doesn't connect with the cloud, advanced machine learning is not there. A known threat can be coming into the network and we would want the cloud to look up the problem. I would also like to see them develop more file replication and machine learning.""They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules.""It is very expensive, the price could be better.""Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.""Management of the appliance could be greatly improved.""The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit.""It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
  • "The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
  • More SafeBreach Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
    Top Answer:The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
    Top Answer:I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,058
    Comparisons
    1,163
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    178
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,032
    Comparisons
    1,439
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk. 

    SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Sample Customers
    PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Government10%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SafeBreach is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 14th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 35 reviews. SafeBreach is rated 8.0, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ and XM Cyber, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiGate, Zscaler Internet Access and Cisco Secure Firewall.

    We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.