Compare FIS Protegent vs. Nasdaq BWise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FIS Protegent Logo
375 views|201 comparisons
Nasdaq BWise Logo
272 views|225 comparisons
Ranking
18th
out of 58 in GRC
Views
375
Comparisons
201
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 58 in GRC
Views
272
Comparisons
225
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SunGard Protegent, Protegent
Learn More
Overview

Compliance officers must manage vast, disparate data and processes to comply with ever-changing global trading regulations, often against tight deadlines. FIS’ Protegent suite of compliance solutions increases visibility across operational data, highlights risk areas for financial crime compliance and integrates workflows for evidence of review. This provides compliance departments with more transparency and efficiency.

A robust platform of Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solutions. This platform is based on a solid foundation of process management, risk management and compliance expertise. Managing corporate responsibilities and obligations, as well as structuring enterprise risk management are all key aspects of the BWise GRC Platform.

Offer
Learn more about FIS Protegent
Learn more about Nasdaq BWise
Sample Customers
A Large European Broker, a global asset management firm
Aegon, The Nielsen Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government8%
No Data Available

FIS Protegent is ranked 18th in GRC while Nasdaq BWise is ranked 21st in GRC. FIS Protegent is rated 0.0, while Nasdaq BWise is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FIS Protegent is most compared with SAI360 and Thomson Reuters Accelus, whereas Nasdaq BWise is most compared with RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.