FlexPod XCS vs Vblock [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp Logo
891 views|421 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
views| comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FlexPod XCS and Vblock [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Converged Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is not complex. It is user-friendly since it is a single solution with all the components delivered in one package.""The real benefit of this solution is that it is pre-architected with the ability to scale-up and scale-out.""It provides ease of automation.""It has been a great product, primarily because of a lot of its deduplication features, and the out-of-the-box thinking on block level storage from NetApp.""FlexPod has improved our company as far as ease of management, stability, and redundancy.""ONTAP is the core of FlexPod, so its most valuable features are: FlexClone, Snapshot, and SnapCenter.""The most valuable features of this solution are efficiency and simplicity.""It ships in a rack, so it is very easy to deploy."

More FlexPod XCS Pros →

"The most valuable features are reliability and high availability.""The most valuable feature is that it is centrally managed, as it is quite easy for our customers to manage everything, end-to-end.""UCS Manager worked well for net/blade management and has allowed fairly easy use of dedicated bare-metal blades.""The component integration means I don't have to worry about technology mismatches.""​It has improved system performance, batch times for off-hours processing, and reliability with production applications.​""VMware NSX: Provides the ability for our organisation to deliver true DR.""The high redundancy of components has minimized frequent service degradation/failure.""​The XtremIO All-Flash array delivers​ performance, reliability, and deduplication."

More Vblock [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"A progress bar would...be pretty cool.""We would like more security features.""It would be great to see some form of interoperability between the FAS units and the E-Series, specifically for replication, even if it is just one more replication from a FAS to an E-Series. That would be amazing.""Both NetApp and Cisco need to do improvements in their day-to-day operations management upgrades.""If there were going to be any improvements, they should probably be UI improvements, overall. It can get a little kludgy sometimes when trying to figure out what to do.""The graphical interface could be made easier to use and more intuitive.""I would like to see programmability into a SaaS-based offering, as I know Cisco's going in a lot of directions with their Intersight application.""They could improve their technical support team. They need to have a specific phone number for you to call in for the FlexPod solution. Some of the partner support knows if it is for FlexPod, they will get you to the right department."

More FlexPod XCS Cons →

"It needs more customer/client involvement in back-end management.""Improve the patching process and timeliness of updates/releases.""While most public clouds are deployed on Linux, there is current no certified Vblock working on KVM hypervisors.""The user control could be more advanced. They should work to improve this in future releases.""OEM services requires too much planning and low availability of certified engineers.""RCM upgrades were not scripted, and you needed to roll on your own. We were led to believe this would be otherwise.""In the next release, I would like to see a smaller footprint in the data center and have improvements to disk performance.""VCE tools, like Vision or AMP were not stand alone, and depended too much on other management consoles."

More Vblock [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing is very affordable from a FlexPod perspective."
  • "It seems very cost effective once it's in place, and it's easy to expand and easy to add capacity without a lot of extra money."
  • "If your company really needs to be up 100% of the time, and you need to do a private data center, I don't know if I could realistically actually recommend another blueprint."
  • "Anytime that you are buying any storage make sure you understand storage. Do not just buy storage based on what somebody sells you in terms of IO or throughput."
  • "Buy storage based on the solutions you need, the technologies you need, and what will make your life a lot easier down the road."
  • "As a whole, it is inexpensive, and it uses the least amount of parts."
  • "Storage is very expensive. To buy MIC cards and additional storage either on-prem or in the cloud, the IT department does not have money for it, so you need a more niche product or a more flexible way to store your data. That is the benefit that you get from this product."
  • "We purchased the solution through CDW. They are a partner and knowledgeable."
  • More FlexPod XCS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Strive for a consolidated ELA."
  • "Related to tech support: I believe it is too expensive."
  • "I would not say the pricing is not good value. It is still on the expensive side, near the top-end of cost compared to what's available now. Also, the licensing has to be improved. There has to be a clear definition of the licensing from the initial set-up so the customer knows what they are paying for, without being hit later on with extra licensing. The licensing definitions should be clearer and, perhaps, have one set of licenses rather than multiple licenses."
  • "It is not cheap."
  • "Vblock appears from the first while to be very expensive. There are more items you cannot see in the BOQ: customer service, support, delivery short time, and highly experienced VCE engineers."
  • "I think the pricing is on the higher end of the spectrum. There could be some adjustments that could be made there. Regarding licensing, watch compatibility with external products that you run on Vblock. It has got to be properly architected, otherwise, you will run into licensing issues."
  • "The paid support for Vblock is expensive."
  • "Vblock is priced at a premium because people don't want the headache of managing and deploying different products."
  • More Vblock [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans. The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ). First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors. Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The system is designed for easy scaling. Because we define everything clearly. So when we plug the system in, we apply the profile, and it scales easily.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not cheaper, but stability is more important for us now. We focus on business gains, not static numbers. Following XCS rules ensures a stable environment, which is crucial. For me… more »
    Top Answer:FlexPod should focus more on automation. Integrating an automation tool with FlexPod would enable customers to leverage automation capabilities. More automation would be helpful. Currently, we… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    891
    Comparisons
    421
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    905
    Rating
    8.6
    Unranked
    In Converged Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VCE Vblock
    Learn More
    Overview

    FlexPod XCS is the secure platform your applications need from edge to cloud. Easily manage your suite of cloud-native, edge, and enterprise apps. Integrate advanced cloud services without compromising performance, security, reliability, or scale.

    VCE Vblock Systems is an all-in-one virtualization platform that integrates the leading storage, network, and compute technologies from the likes of EMC, VMware and Cisco. VCE Vblock allows organizations to easily and securely deploy cloud computing and virtualization in their environments, supporting these multiple technologies and providing flexibility and agility for changing business needs.

    Sample Customers
    University of Sao Paulo, WD-40, The Commonwell Mutual Insurance Group
    Xerox, ACS, and Columbia Sportswear.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Pharma/Biotech Company13%
    Construction Company13%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Converged Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FlexPod XCS is ranked 2nd in Converged Infrastructure with 295 reviews while Vblock [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Converged Infrastructure. FlexPod XCS is rated 8.6, while Vblock [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of FlexPod XCS writes "Integrates everything so you are using fewer tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Vblock [EOL] writes "The VCE VBlocks came along and it was the best combination of an all-in-one virtual data center in a box Converged SAN, Network, and Compute that used VMware to drive the whole package". FlexPod XCS is most compared with Dell PowerFlex, Oracle Exadata, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), VxRail and Dell VxBlock System, whereas Vblock [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Converged Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.