We performed a comparison between Flowmon and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."
"It's easy to use."
"The monitoring features are the most valuable. We have seen a major benefit from that so far."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"The solution primarily drives system information, and I believe it works fine."
"It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"The solution has improved our overrides and the ability to start services if they're stopped."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The licensing price could be better."
"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."
"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and offer a better user interface."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"The initial setup should be easier to complete."
"The management of the servers could be better."
"It'll help if they can provide real-time or closer to real-time monitoring."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
Flowmon is ranked 70th in Network Monitoring Software while SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 77 reviews. Flowmon is rated 8.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Flowmon writes "A stable and scalable solution allowing for the visibility of and the blocking of threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". Flowmon is most compared with Darktrace, SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, WhatsUp Gold and Vectra AI, whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and Nagios XI.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.