Flux vs HCL Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Flux Logo
78 views|66 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
HCLTech Logo
834 views|660 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Flux and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Hatem Hosny
Ranking
32nd
out of 51 in Workload Automation
Views
78
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 51 in Workload Automation
Views
834
Comparisons
660
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Workload Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

HCL Workload Automation enables organizations to gain complete visibility and control over attended and unattended workloads. From a single point of control, it supports multiple platforms, provides advanced integration with enterprise applications like SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce, and offers over 35 out-of-the-box plugins including plugins for FTP and Hadoop activities.

Sample Customers
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company17%
Manufacturing Company12%
Insurance Company11%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise80%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise80%
Buyer's Guide
Workload Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Flux is ranked 32nd in Workload Automation while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. Flux is rated 10.0, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, Stonebranch, AutoSys Workload Automation and Automic Workload Automation.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.