Flux vs RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Flux Logo
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Flux and RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
82
Comparisons
72
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
RepliWeb
Video Not Available
Overview

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.
Sample Customers
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise80%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Flux is rated 10.0, while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] writes "Website code can be done by application owners". Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.