Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and GTB Technologies Inspector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is good and reliable. The vendor company is continually improving it and they seem to stay one step ahead.""The solution is easy to manage.""The solution offers very good sensitive data protection.""After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges.""Stable and scalable solution for data protection. It offers good technical support, and has no major installation issues.""Forcepoint offers many policies that conform to global DLP best practices, including requirements specific to regions like the Middle East, Europe, etc. They have a policy database in their product. That feature is unique to Forcepoint. Their AI and fingerprinting are incredibly effective and robust. We have tested it multiple times. It always catches the correct data being leaked.""One of the most valuable features is the set of built-in policies that Forcepoint has for PCI compliance. We just need to activate them and start working. Without them, it would be a big task to do a data transformation.""The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pros →

"The product has a centralized console for everything.""The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained.""The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice.""This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information.""They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too.""The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month.""I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

More GTB Technologies Inspector Pros →

Cons
"The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving.""It would be better if we could easily integrate with other products. Suppose I want to integrate this DLP with some other CASB solutions or a firewall solution. In that case, it takes a considerable amount of time because Forcepoint DLP doesn't come with a legacy firewall or CASB solutions to integrate with it. We need to do it separately. It's not improvised for different sectors, and I need to look for other solutions. I'm investing a lot of time researching and implementing other solutions for other areas. That is one point where I can't feel satisfied with this Forcepoint DLP. The only problem we have faced is that it consumes most of the CPU whenever a Forcepoint DLP is deployed on an endpoint. This is when users feel some lag in their machine's performance or their Internet performance. That's when we uninstall and try to reinstall, or we'll give a cloud link to which it gets access. We use Forcepoint DLP for endpoint protection, not for email or cloud. For email and drive, we went with the Google DLP. Forcepoint DLP isn't as efficient on drive or chat, or email. For that, we have some specialized solutions, but it would be better to have a single console where you can control all these areas. It would be pretty easy for a consumer who is going to use this product. All in one shot, you can try to track it and enforce your policies on a single dashboard. That is one point currently lacking in Forcepoint, and I feel they need to work on it. In the next release, I would like to use this DLP across different solutions like network, firewall, email, or chat with a consolidated dashboard and with integration facilities with other solutions. Security should work as a whole. It shouldn't work individually in blocks. It does not serve our purpose. It should be integrated with multiple solutions. For that, it should have enough intelligence to work with other tools. I'm looking forward to seeing that kind of capability with Forcepoint.""The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that.""It would be wonderful if the solution could develop more AI and machine learning capabilities. It would also be good if the solution was able to integrate with other ML and AI solutions. Right now, this is lacking.""The post-optical character recognization feature could be improved because it only really works on documents with some length (at least three paragraphs).""The initial setup is a bit complex. You will need help from the peer support team in the configuration.""Everything takes a long time, as it does in every software company, especially since COVID. That is something I notice with every product I use.""The support could improve Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Cons →

"The performance could be better.""The solution’s performance must be improved.""They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well.""The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements.""The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform.""To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones.""It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

More GTB Technologies Inspector Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's not the cheapest solution but it's not the most expensive. It's a good price for a good product."
  • "The pricing and licensing are okay."
  • "The pricing and licensing fees could be improved."
  • "I prefer Forceoint because it is cheaper than Symantec."
  • "The cost for the product for our use is less than $10 per user."
  • "Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."
  • "One feature that I'm getting ready to take advantage of more is the ability to add more data crawlers to the DLP on-prem environment, without any extra Forcepoint costs or licensing needed for that additional data server. That will help in reducing the stress on the data server that we're using now."
  • "Its pricing is quite low considering the features they are offering. As compared to other solutions, it is reasonable. They do have professional support. If we need professional support, then there will be additional costs."
  • More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is very reasonable and competitive."
  • "They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."
  • "When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."
  • "The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."
  • "The tool is not expensive."
  • More GTB Technologies Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We like the ability to customize our requirements and rules, as well as its ease of use and management. It also has a cloud feature and proxy functionality.
    Top Answer:The product has mid-range pricing, which is worth the money.
    Top Answer:The solution could improve user ability in their firewall. It still requires regulatory compliance, which should be addressed immediately.
    Top Answer:The product has a centralized console for everything.
    Top Answer:The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
    Top Answer:The product has an endpoint OCR, which other DLPs don't provide.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,187
    Comparisons
    4,625
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,324
    Comparisons
    731
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    350
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite
    Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is a data loss prevention tool that protects users from advanced threats and data breaches. Forcepoint DLP’s technologies can quickly identify and protect sensitive data and provide insight and awareness into attacks on endpoint devices both on and off the network.

    With company data constantly on the move, data security teams must have visibility and control across all channels - endpoint, web, network, email, and cloud. Forcepoint DLP provides protection and visibility across all data in the cloud as well as on-premises. One of the key features of Forcepoint DLP is its ability to identify data at rest, in motion, and in use and efficiently secure sensitive information.

    Forcepoint DLP key features:

    • Identify, remediate and secure sensitive data with network, cloud, and endpoint discovery.
    • Central management of policies across all channels, including cloud, endpoint, network, web, and email.
    • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to identify data embedded in images.
    • Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for validation checks, real name detection, and proximity analysis.
    • Custom encryption identification for exposing concealed data.
    • Machine learning, which allows users to train the system to identify unfamiliar data. Users can provide the engine with positive and negative examples so similar data can be flagged.
    • Analytics for identifying changes in user behavior. These analytics are leveraged to better understand user risk and are then implemented as automated policy enforcement based on the risk level of the user.
    • Cloud protection for monitoring and preventing the loss of sensitive data online, and assessing the risk posed by visited websites.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Forcepoint DLP stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its risk analysis features and its OCR and data discovery capabilities.

    Allan P., an associate consultant at Atos, writes, “With OCR and Risk Analysis, we are able to determine if anything sensitive has been shared. OCR helps us to safeguard those things and with risk ranking, we can determine which user is trying to violate policies multiple times even though they have been blocked. It does require additional servers, as the processing and result of the incident is high, however, it's worth using to see all the use cases being met with these two features as well. They are the best features provided by Forcepoint.”

    Mahesh D., A senior manager at 2Five1, notes, “The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions. Endpoint protection, web protection, network protection, and storage use are valuable features. Among these, endpoint protection is most valuable. It has good policies and good mechanisms to detect incidents. The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions. Endpoint protection, web protection, network protection, and storage use are valuable features. Among these, endpoint protection is most valuable. It has good policies and good mechanisms to detect incidents.”

    Inspector is Inspection Software to manage any type of inspection to aid compliance, reduce risk, eliminate paperwork, and make you audit ready. Define what you want to inspect, when, the checks to be carried out, set pass, fail criteria, define incident creation rules, workflow and resolution deadlines. Use the mobile application to perform inspections on smart phone, tablet or mobile computer. Dashboards show compliance, incident rates and resolution activity. Start a 30 day free trial today.
    Sample Customers
    Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services
    Supya Security Software
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Security Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 50 reviews while GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian and Safetica ONE. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.