Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention offers robust data protection capabilities, seamless integration, and reliable incident response mechanisms. Users appreciate its prevention of data leakage and policy enforcement. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on safeguarding sensitive data, offering comprehensive visibility, and efficient breach detection. Users praise its affordability, ease of use, and seamless integration with Microsoft tools. Both products have strong customer service, but Forcepoint users desire a better interface and reporting, while Purview users seek more accurate breach prevention and customizable policy options.

Features: The valuable features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention include robust data protection capabilities, comprehensive policy enforcement, and reliable incident response mechanisms. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention highlights safeguarding sensitive data, comprehensive visibility and control over data, and efficient detection of potential data breaches.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is described as minimal, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is praised for its affordability. Users find the licensing process for Forcepoint straightforward, while Microsoft Purview offers flexible and accommodating licensing options., Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention has received highly beneficial user reviews, emphasizing its efficient data protection capabilities, prevention of information loss and leakage, improved productivity, enhanced security, and cost savings. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention received notably positive feedback, highlighting its effectiveness in preventing data loss, reliable data protection features, seamless integration with existing systems, and tangible benefits in terms of enhanced data security and protection.

Room for Improvement: Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention has been criticized for its user interface, reporting capabilities, documentation, technical support, and customization options. In comparison, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention requires enhancements in accuracy, policy options, user interface, and integration with other Microsoft applications.

Deployment and customer support: The user reviews show that the implementation time for Forcepoint DLP ranges from one week to three months, while the implementation time for Microsoft Purview DLP varies from one week to three months. The reviews suggest that the time frames mentioned should be taken into consideration, as they might refer to separate phases or the same period., The customer service for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention received positive feedback for their helpful and knowledgeable support team. Microsoft Purview's customer service is highly regarded for its promptness, efficiency, and reliability of assistance.

The summary above is based on 41 interviews we conducted recently with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure.""Technical support has been helpful.""The solution is easy to manage.""The scalability is fantastic. One of the things that I like about Forcepoint is that I can customize the solution to suit my objectives.""The fingerprinting technology is the solution's most valuable feature. It's unique to Forcepoint.""Our organization's intellectual property is not misused or extracted without permission.""The most valuable feature is the endpoint DLP. It's specific to copying to the USB or copying to the internal storage in our office.""The initial setup process went well."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pros →

"One of the valuable features of Purview is the ability to create a legal hold on a user's account within the compliance portal. That's pretty useful when it comes to any litigation or if you want to redeem the content within a mailbox, OneDrive, or a generic public SharePoint site.""We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies.""Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's responses are faster. Its installation is also reliable. The security score helps with the security part.""There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems.""The product is easy to configure.""The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts.""The product can block the uploads to cloud services.""The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature. It goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories. It covers the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive. It is really helpful in those areas."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The ease of deployment wasn't as flexible as Digital Guardian.""The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving.""The support could improve Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.""There is room for improvement regarding OCR. I would like to see it enhanced to handle multiple languages and it should be easier to manage.""The policy update size and agent size could be improved. We would also like to have a proper solution for Linux OS which Forcepoint does not offer.""The user-friendliness of the interface in formulating DLP policies could be improved. An example would be managing policies. It's a little daunting at first, and can be confusing, at times, when it comes to how to set things up and how to add policies. They could improve on that.""With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format.""I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use."

More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Cons →

"There is no AIP for Linux systems. That's a setback. Another thing it's lacking is libraries to work with Python. It has libraries for C# and C++, for example, but not for Python and, these days, Python is very useful.""A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that.""The support is poor.""The platform can be challenging to navigate and has the potential for improvement.""Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's licensing is expensive.""The scalability, in terms of the portal, could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have faced difficulties in identifying the options.""There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great.""The solution should provide better integration with other systems."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's not the cheapest solution but it's not the most expensive. It's a good price for a good product."
  • "The pricing and licensing are okay."
  • "The pricing and licensing fees could be improved."
  • "I prefer Forceoint because it is cheaper than Symantec."
  • "The cost for the product for our use is less than $10 per user."
  • "Forcepoint DLP is a bit expensive."
  • "One feature that I'm getting ready to take advantage of more is the ability to add more data crawlers to the DLP on-prem environment, without any extra Forcepoint costs or licensing needed for that additional data server. That will help in reducing the stress on the data server that we're using now."
  • "Its pricing is quite low considering the features they are offering. As compared to other solutions, it is reasonable. They do have professional support. If we need professional support, then there will be additional costs."
  • More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."
  • "Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."
  • "The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."
  • "It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."
  • "We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • "I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We like the ability to customize our requirements and rules, as well as its ease of use and management. It also has a cloud feature and proxy functionality.
    Top Answer:The product has mid-range pricing, which is worth the money.
    Top Answer:The solution could improve user ability in their firewall. It still requires regulatory compliance, which should be addressed immediately.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts.
    Top Answer:The Endpoint DLP engine has a lot of delays. The just-in-time protection feature does not always work as expected, mainly when working with network files in a more classic environment.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,187
    Comparisons
    4,625
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    424
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    8,051
    Comparisons
    5,180
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    696
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Forcepoint DLP, Forcepoint Data Security Suite, Websense Data Security Suite
    Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP
    Learn More
    Overview

    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is a data loss prevention tool that protects users from advanced threats and data breaches. Forcepoint DLP’s technologies can quickly identify and protect sensitive data and provide insight and awareness into attacks on endpoint devices both on and off the network.

    With company data constantly on the move, data security teams must have visibility and control across all channels - endpoint, web, network, email, and cloud. Forcepoint DLP provides protection and visibility across all data in the cloud as well as on-premises. One of the key features of Forcepoint DLP is its ability to identify data at rest, in motion, and in use and efficiently secure sensitive information.

    Forcepoint DLP key features:

    • Identify, remediate and secure sensitive data with network, cloud, and endpoint discovery.
    • Central management of policies across all channels, including cloud, endpoint, network, web, and email.
    • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to identify data embedded in images.
    • Personally Identifiable Information (PII) for validation checks, real name detection, and proximity analysis.
    • Custom encryption identification for exposing concealed data.
    • Machine learning, which allows users to train the system to identify unfamiliar data. Users can provide the engine with positive and negative examples so similar data can be flagged.
    • Analytics for identifying changes in user behavior. These analytics are leveraged to better understand user risk and are then implemented as automated policy enforcement based on the risk level of the user.
    • Cloud protection for monitoring and preventing the loss of sensitive data online, and assessing the risk posed by visited websites.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Forcepoint DLP stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its risk analysis features and its OCR and data discovery capabilities.

    Allan P., an associate consultant at Atos, writes, “With OCR and Risk Analysis, we are able to determine if anything sensitive has been shared. OCR helps us to safeguard those things and with risk ranking, we can determine which user is trying to violate policies multiple times even though they have been blocked. It does require additional servers, as the processing and result of the incident is high, however, it's worth using to see all the use cases being met with these two features as well. They are the best features provided by Forcepoint.”

    Mahesh D., A senior manager at 2Five1, notes, “The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions. Endpoint protection, web protection, network protection, and storage use are valuable features. Among these, endpoint protection is most valuable. It has good policies and good mechanisms to detect incidents. The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions. Endpoint protection, web protection, network protection, and storage use are valuable features. Among these, endpoint protection is most valuable. It has good policies and good mechanisms to detect incidents.”

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    Sample Customers
    Alphawest, Betsson, Cellcom Israel Ltd., Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, Confartigianato Vicenza, EverBank, Finansbank, iGATE, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Reliance Capital, Remosa, Toyota, Scavolini, Zim Integrated Shipping Services
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Security Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Retailer5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business52%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 50 reviews while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is ranked 1st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 13 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention writes "Automation has given us consistent analytics and improved quality of insights into user activity". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Zscaler Cloud DLP and GTB Technologies Inspector, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Intune, Amazon Macie, Zscaler Cloud DLP and Digital Guardian. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.