We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and Symantec Data Loss Prevention based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Symantec comes out on top in this comparison. According to its reviewers, it is more fairly priced and a more comprehensive and powerful solution than Forcepoint. Forcepoint does come out on top in the Support category, however.
"The solution offers very good sensitive data protection."
"We appreciate the user-friendliness and ease of implementation of the Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention platform. The availability of the vendor support team is an added advantage."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten."
"Stable and scalable solution for data protection. It offers good technical support, and has no major installation issues."
"The integration is great."
"The product is good and reliable. The vendor company is continually improving it and they seem to stay one step ahead."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"It has good options for policy findings. You can do granular policy enhancements with multiple options. And the SMB blocking is a very good feature."
"The solution offers great reporting."
"The Network Monitor component is the most advanced on the market. Combined with the other Network DLP components."
"We work in the banking field. We deploy data loss prevention. Our branch protects our clients' data, credit card numbers, account numbers, and other confidential and sensitive data."
"It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex."
"Good end point encryption and data loss prevention."
"The solution is simple to use with good administrative controls and a console that is easy to understand."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Data Loss Prevention are endpoint security, endpoint agent, and DLP. Additionally, we have been satisfied with the policies."
"It should integrate better with email."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."
"The deployment and troubleshooting aspects of Forcepoint need improving."
"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."
"I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use."
"An area for improvement in Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is the complex UI and policy deployment. You have to find the policies, and then designing the policies is also tricky."
"The solution lacks sufficient customization."
"We need to have agent auto-parsing."
"The solution relies on and Oracle database which is not financially feasible for many customers."
"Since being acquired by Broadcom, the support has really degraded for small and medium enterprises."
"There should be more documentation with Symantec Data Loss Prevention. We had trouble with the first few deployments."
"It is very difficult to log in to create a support ticket because no one is available to support our queries."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control capabilities of the DLP solution."
"In the object capture recognition, which we implemented recently, there are a lot of false positives that have been happening."
"I would like to see changes to the analytics."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 51 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Zscaler DLP and GTB Technologies Inspector, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Zscaler DLP and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.