Forcepoint Email Security vs. Menlo Security Email Security Comparison

Sponsored
Cisco Email Security Read 17 Cisco Email Security reviews. 9,195 views\|5,714 comparisons	Forcepoint Email Security Read 4 Forcepoint Email Security reviews. 1,946 views\|1,350 comparisons	Menlo Security Email Security 91 views\|76 comparisons

Anonymous User

Information Security Analyst at a healthcare company

Black-listing and white-listing are highly intuitive and easy to do

One of the things that I like most is that, since we do have a Cisco Enterprise agreement - we have a lot of Cisco products - we're able to... Read more »

Secengin46

Security Engineer at a tech services company

Efficiently protects against malicious email contents, but the reporting and dashboards need improvement

Our clients have given us feedback to say that this product is fairing well, and it is efficiently filtering junk, viruses, and other malicious... Read more »

Use Menlo Security Email Security? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Email Security. Updated: July 2020.

Download now

431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee.We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy. More Cisco Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice »	The licensing is user base (per user). The product is purchased mostly by medium to large companies. For smaller companies, we have other solutions because the pricing is not cheap.There are three types of support licenses.When compared to other email security solutions, the price is not cheap.Licensing is a yearly subscription that is based on the number of users. More Forcepoint Email Security Pricing and Cost Advice »	Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
FireEye Email Security vs. Cisco Email Security Compared 23% of the time. Fortinet FortiMail vs. Cisco Email Security Compared 20% of the time. Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Cisco Email Security Compared 13% of the time. Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Cisco Email Security Compared 11% of the time. Symantec Messaging Gateway vs. Cisco Email Security Compared 6% of the time. See more Cisco Email Security competitors » + Add more products to compare	Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Forcepoint Email Security Compared 20% of the time. Fortinet FortiMail vs. Forcepoint Email Security Compared 12% of the time. Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Forcepoint Email Security Compared 11% of the time. FireEye Email Security vs. Forcepoint Email Security Compared 7% of the time. Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection vs. Forcepoint Email Security Compared 6% of the time. See more Forcepoint Email Security competitors » + Add more products to compare	Proofpoint Email Protection vs. Menlo Security Email Security Compared 100% of the time. See more Menlo Security Email Security competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances	Websense Email Security
Learn
Cisco	Forcepoint	Menlo Security
Overview
Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.	Forcepoint Email Security gives you the security you need by protecting you against multi-stage advanced threats that often exploit email to penetrate your IT environment. It applies real-time behavioral sandboxing, enterprise-grade DLP and other advanced defense technologies to identify targeted attacks, high-risk users and insider threats. Forcepoint Email Security monitors outbound email to prevent leaks of sensitive information, and it empowers your workers — in the office or on the road — to safely adopt technologies like Microsoft Office 365.	Preserved Email Experience Email and webmail isolation is completely transparent to end users, giving them the native email experience and functionality they’ve always enjoyed. There are no new applications to learn and no new interactions to get used to. Everything works the same as before. Seamless Integration Menlo seamlessly integrates with the most common email platforms (Gmail, Exchange, Office 365) to give users quick, nimble access to their work email and personal webmail. Users get the same look, feel, and functionality they expect. Nothing seems different. That means no agents and no client for cloud or on-premise deployment. Phishing Awareness Training Even though the Menlo Security Isolation Platform takes end users out of the equation by isolating all traffic, Menlo allows you to reinforce phishing awareness training by providing custom time-of-click warning messages.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco Email Security Learn More	Learn more about Forcepoint Email Security Learn More	Learn more about Menlo Security Email Security Learn More
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra	Alphawest, Amadori, AudioNova, Betsson, Confartigianato Vicenza, Davies Turner, iGATE, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Landa Digital Printing, Northern California Bank, Scavolini, Toyota	Macy's, HSBC, Bank of Hawaii
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Energy/Utilities Company22% Healthcare Company11% Manufacturing Company11% University11% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Comms Service Provider27% Computer Software Company21% Energy/Utilities Company15% Government5%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company37% Comms Service Provider24% Media Company9% Insurance Company8%	No Data Available

Sponsored
Cisco Email Security Read 17 Cisco Email Security reviews. 9,195 views\|5,714 comparisons	Forcepoint Email Security Read 4 Forcepoint Email Security reviews. 1,946 views\|1,350 comparisons	Menlo Security Email Security 91 views\|76 comparisons

Compare Forcepoint Email Security vs. Menlo Security Email Security