We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Juniper vSRX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I think that the UTM features are the most value, as it truly protects my infrastructure."
"Fortinet FortiGate has many valuable features, such as IDS, and intrusion detection. It has security features that are in part with the technologies that are available in the market."
"It's super reliable. I don't think I've ever had a reliability issue with it."
"The security features that they have are quite good. On top of that, their licensing model is quite nice where they don't charge you anything for the SD-WAN functionality for the firewall."
"Whenever I need something, Fortinet improves and updates the software for me."
"The solution can scale well."
"I like that they have given me a solution at a fair price."
"The most important features with FortiGate are the web filter and application controls. We can control our internet usage and use the web filter for application purposes."
"Forcepoint's stability is satisfactory, for the most part."
"The most valuable feature is controlling the traffic and the logging. They have real-time logins for traffic logs. Troubleshooting was very easy for me."
"I have two offices, and I can route the internet of both offices using the same product. The connectivity is great."
"I don't have anything bad to say about the product. I absolutely love it."
"When comparing this solution to others this one has better reporting, user management, and is easy to use."
"Forcepoint is a good, stable solution."
"The people we deal with is a local partner in Cambodia and we can get good support from them."
"Next Generation Firewall's best feature is that it can be managed on one platform."
"The dashboard, customization, API, and pricing are good."
"The authentication part is seamless and easy for people."
"The command feature is valuable."
"It's much faster to deploy a power source. If you need to deploy a firewall in the cloud of software, it's much easier and much faster than deploying the office firewall in a rush."
"The architecture of the OS in Juniper is very good. It's flexibility, scalability, and the technicality is also good."
"The hardware is stable."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"This solution works well. Their switches and firewall are good."
"Lacks sufficient security options."
"Fortinet FortiGate is a firewall solution and once it's deployed, you can rest assured that your system is secure."
"The UI could be improved."
"The logs need to be better. They need to be more visible and easier to access."
"We were not able to build a full-mesh VPN; however, I am not sure if this was the fault of Fortinet FortiGate."
"I feel that the reporting needs to be improved."
"We would like to have the ability to disable some of the security functionalities."
"I'm not sure if it's something that they already have or are developing something, however, we need some dedicated features for container security."
"They should have a local vendor who can provide support. Most of the support is overseas, so the time zones can be a problem."
"They need to improve their alerts."
"The solution needs to build upon its network functionality. It needs to be a bit smarter."
"While they offer a comprehensive bundled solution, some users may prefer on-premise deployments for certain features, such as URL filtering."
"They should provide more details on potential cyber threats."
"They need to work on stability, it has not been the best in our experience."
"I would like to see more sizing in the next release, and the roadmap should be clear."
"The company should update the URL filtering database. They need to enhance the URL filtering and make it easier to customize."
"The solution should consider improving its licensing policies."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"I would like to see an activity sensor for malicious content or sensor for viruses and malware."
"The tool's basic license does not cover everything. It needs to improve visibility and availability."
"The solution can be improved by allowing automatic updates for the OS devices."
"Juniper vSRX is expensive."
"The solution's GUI needs improvement."
More Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is ranked 31st in Firewalls with 39 reviews while Juniper vSRX is ranked 26th in Firewalls with 30 reviews. Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is rated 7.6, while Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall writes "Good URL filtering with helpful technical support and good scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, Check Point NGFW, Cisco Secure Firewall, Sophos XG and Netgate pfSense, whereas Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall. See our Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs. Juniper vSRX report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
