We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. GoSecure Web Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, McAfee, TitanHQ and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing is not expensive.""The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive.""Licensing is flexible. License pricing information is based on the customer, their environment, and on the future approach.""The solution is priced a little high compare to similar solutions.""Overall, I am not aware of the option to pay for one time use of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway.""The price of this solution is reasonable."

More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Filtering solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I have found the web content filtering and malware filter the most valuable.
Top Answer: There should be more hardware models available and the application control could improve.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
Views
7,329
Comparisons
4,544
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
634
Rating
7.9
9th
Views
29
Comparisons
6
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Forcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
Learn More
Overview
Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access.

GoSecure Web Security offers a unique combination of fine-grained content filtering combined with threat detection and mitigation methods to assure powerful protection from Advanced Persistent Threats, including botnets, malware, viruses and others.

Offer
Learn more about Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Learn more about GoSecure Web Security
Sample Customers
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company11%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider24%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise53%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, McAfee, TitanHQ and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 1st in Web Content Filtering with 14 reviews while GoSecure Web Security is ranked 9th in Web Content Filtering. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 8.0, while GoSecure Web Security is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Flexible endpoint security, provides URL filtering, and the reporting is good". On the other hand, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiProxy, McAfee Web Protection and Trend Micro Web Security, whereas GoSecure Web Security is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.