We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security."I have found the web content filtering and malware filter the most valuable."
"Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway does most of its job well, but I especially like its data security feature."
"The tool categorizes the user profiles which is very comfortable."
"Real-time analytics."
"Giving visibility to people's actions in the network, while keeping attackers out: across data centers, offices, branches, and the cloud."
"It’s pretty stable after you get up and running."
"The antiviral sandboxing."
"It has protected clients against cyberattacks."
"Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"There are several issues with the product. Version 8.4 can only be managed with a CLI, they removed the nice GUI interface from version 8.1. The load-balancing needs massive improvements. The incident lists don’t sync between appliances, they need to be manually edited for each one."
"A room for improvement in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is the support it offers. It's very bad. What I'd like to see in the next release of the product is for it to be less complicated because at the moment Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is more complicated than other products. Sometimes issues come up that you can't solve without the support team. For example, you should write the root password to fix the issue. In the next release of the product, it would be good if it had an easy-to-use interface. Troubleshooting issues in Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway should be less complicated as well."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"The technical support team's response time could be improved."
"The firewall doesn't have any features because some customers are requesting they will install the firewall without licensing. At this time we cannot go further without licensing. Licensing is a must with Forcepoint Web Security firewalls."
"The initial setup was complex."
"A feature we wish to see addressed in the next release of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway involves its administration."
"But the deployment could be easier. It might take from one day to three days. Usually, that involves an engineer from the vendor and a working team at the enterprise."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 4th in Internet Security with 47 reviews while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 8th in Internet Security with 1 review. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 7.8, while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Simple to set up, reliable, and offers great reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Symantec Proxy, Fortinet FortiProxy and Fortinet FortiGate SWG, whereas Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Cloudflare Access and Perimeter 81.
See our list of best Internet Security vendors.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.