Compare Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. Menlo Web Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Menlo Web Security? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.""The licensing is not expensive.""The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive.""Licensing is flexible. License pricing information is based on the customer, their environment, and on the future approach."

More Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Security Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is okay. We pay licensing fees but the cost depends on the package that we take. There are… more »
Top Answer: The issues we have are more around organizational issues between us and Forcepoint. We don't have problems with the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenDNSForcepoint SWG, Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITONMenlo Security Web Security
Learn
Cisco
Forcepoint
Menlo Security
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access.

Menlo Security’s Secure Web Gateway delivers 100% security. It reduces your attack surface and improves security team productivity by simply eliminating threats. Built in the cloud for the cloud, the service includes an industry-leading SLA to ensure fast connections with minimal latency, enabling companies to embrace a cloud-first architecture for digital transformation.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Learn more about Menlo Web Security
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaimAdventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, ToyotaTribune Media
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company26%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
Integrator7%
University7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider18%
Real Estate/Law Firm11%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise60%
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise60%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: October 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is ranked 3rd in Web Security Gateways with 10 reviews while Menlo Web Security is ranked unranked in Web Security Gateways. Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is rated 8.0, while Menlo Web Security is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway writes "Flexible endpoint security, provides URL filtering, and the reporting is good". On the other hand, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Secure Email, McAfee Web Protection, Symantec Secure Web Gateway and Barracuda Web Security Gateway, whereas Menlo Web Security is most compared with Authentic8 Silo for Safe Access, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Bromium, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and Symantec Web Isolation.

See our list of best Web Security Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Web Security Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.