Compare Forcepoint Web Security vs. M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL]

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL]? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive.The licensing is not expensive.The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.

More Forcepoint Web Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Filtering solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
8,424
Comparisons
4,305
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
518
Avg. Rating
8.0
Unranked
In Web Content Filtering
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Websense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITON
Learn
Forcepoint
Trustwave
Video Not Available
Overview
Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access. Trustwave Web Filtering is a granular policy-based solution that monitors and blocks access to offensive or potentially harmful sites. ITrustwave Web Filtering monitors web requests and matches those against a database of inappropriate categories or URL keywords, which provides depth and control over policies. Organizations can add more than 100 custom categories. Administrators can create policies based on individuals, groups, containers or workstations and provides management with tools to enforce an organization's acceptable-use policies and limits legal liabilities resulting from exposure to inappropriate or offensive web content. Trustwave Web Filtering includes a mobile security client and the product permits real-time and forensic reporting via a centrally managed tool
Offer
Learn more about Forcepoint Web Security
Learn more about M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL]
Sample Customers
Adventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, ToyotaCrest Savings Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Healthcare Company18%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
No Data Available
Forcepoint Web Security is ranked 1st in Web Content Filtering with 8 reviews while M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] is ranked unranked in Web Content Filtering. Forcepoint Web Security is rated 8.0, while M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] is rated 0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Web Security writes "Good security categorization and resolution options, with helpful and responsive technical support". On the other hand, Forcepoint Web Security is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Email Security, McAfee Web Protection and Barracuda Web Security Gateway, whereas M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.