Compare Forcepoint Web Security vs. Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL]

Forcepoint Web Security is ranked 3rd in Web Security Gateways with 8 reviews while Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] is ranked unranked in Web Security Gateways with 1 review. Forcepoint Web Security is rated 8.0, while Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] is rated 3.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Web Security writes "Good security categorization and resolution options, with helpful and responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] writes "No support for cloud or large scale". Forcepoint Web Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Email Security, McAfee Web Protection, Barracuda Web Security Gateway and Symantec Secure Web Gateway, whereas Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Trustwave Secure Web Gateway and TitanHQ WebTitan.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great.It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy.The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.The most valuable feature is that it secures our network against blacklisted or malicious websites.Using this solution has meant that we've needed to make fewer firewall changes.The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability.

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

The spam filter is very effective.The antiviral sandboxing.Once deployed, the management console is simple and easy to use.For the most part, the solution, when set up correctly, works fine.The most valuable feature is the categorization, where you can allow general access to an application but limit specific features.In terms of functionality, Forcepoint is the best web proxy available.The most valuable feature of Forcepoint Web Security is creating the easy to install further policies that are deployed through the Forcepoint security manual at some stage. Just drag and drop and the policies are there.It has protected clients against cyberattacks.

More Forcepoint Web Security Pros »

The setup was fairly straightforward. It's just a proxy.

More Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] Pros »

Cons
The reporting could be improved by way of the information that's displayed. For example, when you pull a report, it shows an internal employee going to many websites, but you can spin that right down by saying a lot of it is being cached.I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.Support for multiple domains is important to us.I would like to see DLP integration in the next release of this solution.Security, overall, can always be improved.

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

We have a lot of false positives, which is one area that can be improved.Sometimes attacks or a new ransomware gets through.In the on-premises version, I don't like the deployment and structuring of the device.Overall the software is occupying too much memory space. If they could remedy that, it would be a better experience, because today Windows is occupying too much memory space as well (in terms of the RAM), and this software has also started occupying all the memory. Due to this, I have less space for my other office products and data. I can't, for example, operate a huge Excel sheet or other datasets.The deployment is a bit complex and it requires expertise to deploy, which is something that should be improved and made easier to do.The solution should be better able to support itself and operate faster. Sometimes the technical support team takes too long to respond.The firewall doesn't have any features because some customers are requesting they will install the firewall without licensing. At this time we cannot go further without licensing. Licensing is a must with Forcepoint Web Security firewalls.Ease of use could be improved.

More Forcepoint Web Security Cons »

There's no cloud proxy solution. It's purely on premise, it's a cell inspection, but it doesn't allow any sandboxing. It also doesn't do any tunneling inspection or anything like that.

More Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.The price could be lower.The product is pricey compared to Cisco Firepower.

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

The price of this product should be reduced to make it more competitive.The licensing is not expensive.The pricing on Forcepoint Web Security is fair. Fair pricing at current market rates, if you are comparing with the competition.

More Forcepoint Web Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

Pricing is on a yearly basis. I don't know of any additional costs.

More Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Security Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenDNSWebsense Web Security, Forcepoint TRITONM86 WebMarshal
Learn
Cisco
Forcepoint
Trustwave
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Websense Web Security blocks web threats to reduce malware infections, decrease help desk incidents and free up valuable IT resources. It has more than 100 security and filtering categories, hundreds of web application and protocol controls, and 60-plus reports with customization and role-based access.

Trustwave WebMarshal (formerly known as M86 WebMarshal) is a secure Web gateway solution that provides Web threat protection as well as policy control to safely manage workplace Internet use. In a Web 2.0 world, your organization is increasingly reliant on Internet access for business, education and work/life balance. Yet, in terms of security and data protection, Web 2.0 has created an unprecedented risk environment with new threats and vulnerabilities. Trustwave WebMarshal offers Web gateway security in an easy-to-use, highly scalable and cost-effective software solution.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Forcepoint Web Security
Learn more about Trustwave WebMarshal [EOL]
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaimAdventist Health, Alphawest, Amadori, Anoka County, Compartamos Banco, Davies Turner, EverBank, iGATE, Karlstad Municipality, Lake Michigan Credit Union, Scavolini, Smurfit Kappa, Toyota
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Consumer Goods Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
K 12 Educational Company Or School11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company28%
Government6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Healthcare Company18%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Insurance Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: July 2020.
430,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Web Security Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Web Security Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.