Compare ForgeRock vs. IBM Security Access Manager

ForgeRock is ranked 7th in Access Management with 2 reviews while IBM Security Access Manager is ranked 14th in Access Management with 2 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 7.6, while IBM Security Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "A stable and scalable solution but it requires better technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Access Manager writes "Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenIAM and Ping Identity, whereas IBM Security Access Manager is most compared with Okta, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium and ForgeRock.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Security Access Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.

Read more »

It's a good solution for identification and access management.The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.

Read more »

Cons
They should improve the solution by include reporting.The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.

Read more »

The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly.Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
8,360
Comparisons
4,961
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
324
Avg. Rating
7.5
14th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
286
Comparisons
242
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
227
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 38% of the time.
Also Known As
ISAM
Learn
ForgeRock
IBM
Overview
Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.

IBM Security Access Manager helps you simplify your users' access while more securely adopting web, mobile, IoT and cloud technologies. It can be deployed on-premises, in a virtual or hardware appliance or containerized with Docker. ISAM helps you strike a balance between usability and security through the use of risk-based access, single sign-on, integrated access management control, identity federation and mobile multi-factor authentication. Take back control of your access management with IBM Security Access Manager.

Offer
Learn more about ForgeRock
Learn more about IBM Security Access Manager
Sample Customers
Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western UniversityPOST Luxembourg
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.