Compare ForgeRock vs. Oracle Access Manager

ForgeRock is ranked 7th in Access Management with 2 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 11th in Access Management with 5 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 7.6, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "A stable and scalable solution but it requires better technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "Has the ability to customize it with your own code but is too complex for most uses". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenIAM and Ping Identity, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta, CA SSO and Ping Identity. See our ForgeRock vs. Oracle Access Manager report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about ForgeRock vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable.The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent.

Read more »

The product allows customization via custom code.The product was built to be scalable.In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively.The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients.I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one.Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.

Read more »

Cons
They should improve the solution by include reporting.The identity management model needs a bit of improvement.

Read more »

The technical support is not very good at all.The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.There are problems with stability.The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive.The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality.In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface.May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Can be expensive as a solution.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
8,360
Comparisons
4,961
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
324
Avg. Rating
7.5
11th
out of 26 in Access Management
Views
881
Comparisons
549
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
534
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Learn
ForgeRock
Oracle
Overview
Open source provisioning solution for real-time user management life cycle automation.Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
Offer
Learn more about ForgeRock
Learn more about Oracle Access Manager
Sample Customers
Geico, Thomson Reuters, Salesforce, McKesson, Trinet, SKY, BNP Paribas, Deloitte, Capgemini, North Western UniversitySekerBank, University of Melbourne
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about ForgeRock vs. Oracle Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
397,983 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.