We performed a comparison between Forter and Riskified based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
Earn 20 points
Forter is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Riskified is ranked 4th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 3 reviews. Forter is rated 9.0, while Riskified is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Riskified writes "Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful". Forter is most compared with Signifyd, Sift Digital Trust and Safety, Kount and ThreatMetrix, whereas Riskified is most compared with Kount, Amazon Fraud Detector, Accertify Interceptas, Signifyd and ThreatMetrix.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
