We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."
"If anyone makes an error, or if an incident occurs by accident, the business will not be harmed as a result of this activity."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"The user interface could be improved."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"It does the job I paid for, but the graphical interface could be improved."
"For improvement, Fortinet needs to ensure that they provide quick support to users...Fortinet sometimes needs to respond to users facing issues within an hour."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"There are multiple areas that are in need of improvement. It is not a mature product."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo. See our CyberArk Identity vs. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.