We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Imanami GroupID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services"
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews while Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor, ManageEngine ADManager Plus and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.