We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."I work a lot with Fortinet products and I call the support often. They are very quick to respond and the support is very good."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"It keeps track of users and their IPs no matter where they are in the network. When users roam, we don't have to worry about not mapping them to an IP."
"The most valuable feature is the OTP on the mobile phone."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"I would like to see more support from Fortinet with tech support people who have as much expertise on the authenticator as they do on their firewalls."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible."
"The technical support team is bad."
"We would like to see Linux-based operating systems be able to integrate with FortiAuthenticator to get two-factor authentication running on them. as well. This is a shortcoming that I have faced a few times already."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"They should have a landing page."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 50 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiNAC and Cisco Duo, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0 and Keeper.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.