We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most relevant feature is Omada's reporting engine. Omada never 'forgets' and archives every process. All steps an admin, user, or manager has executed, are recorded in Omada."
"The identity lifecycle support is definitely valuable because we are a complex organization, and there is a lot of onboarding, movement, and offboarding in our organization. We have 31,000 users, and there are a lot of users who are constantly onboarding, offboarding, and moving. So, we need to make sure that these activities are supported. In old times, we used to do everything manually. Everyone was onboarded, offboarded, or moved manually. So, from a business point of view and an economics point of view, identity lifecycle is most valuable. From a security point of view, access review is the most important feature for us."
"User-friendly solution."
"We are able to onboard new user accounts much faster by automating the process and standardizing our operations globally. Previously, there were many individual processes and manual admin interactions. We also see a lot of cost savings and benefits because through automation and standardization."
"Omada's best feature is creating accounts, automatically assigning permissions, and distributing resources based on assignment policies."
"It scales in terms of numbers and types of identities. It can govern the on-premise applications as well as the cloud applications. So, it can manage hybrid environments with all types of identities and various load amounts."
"Omada offers a technical solution that addresses both our needs."
"The support response time and the freedom from strange bugs and strange things happening in the software are valuable."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"The web feature is quite versatile. It serves as the sole server authenticator and is valuable not only with FortiGate products but also within the entire Forti system, making it highly useful for me."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"FortiAuthenticator is really good software that integrates very well with Fortinet products."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks."
"It's a stable and scalable solution."
"I have found the OIM Connector framework, based on ICF, to be the most valuable feature."
"Oracle Identity manager is the best tool in the market for access managers."
"Its most valuable feature is its scalability."
"What I like most about Oracle Identity Governance is that it is a very flexible tool. It allows you to do any customization on Java as it is built on Java and you can write any customization code using Java. I also like that Oracle Identity Governance is pretty much stable. In my company, there are a lot of users, so my company prefers this solution."
"The most important features that have impacted our environment recently are the Single Sign-On solution, role based provisioning, and the automated provisioning of accounts to target systems."
"The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors."
"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."
"I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now."
"One thing that we are not so happy about is the user interface. It is a bit dated. I know that they are working on that, but the user interface is quite dated. Currently, it is a little bit difficult to customize the user interface to the need of the business, which is a little bit disappointing. It needs it to be a little bit easier to operate, and it should have a better user interface."
"When you do a recalculation of an identity, it's hard to understand what was incorrect before you started the recalculation, and which values are actually updated... all you see are all the new fields that are provisioned, instead of seeing only the fields that are changed."
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement."
"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"The user interface could be improved. The interface between Omada and the user is mainly text-based."
"Omada Identity has a steep learning curve."
"The technical support team is bad."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive."
"Improvements in the product could start from the dashboard, overall customization, and configuration."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"There are multiple areas that are in need of improvement. It is not a mature product."
"Lacks a simplified two-factor authentication process."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"I would like to see more ways to authenticate, such as adding facial recognition to the two-factor, where you log into your phone or another device."
"It's a complex solution, so it will take time in terms of deployment."
"You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement."
"Our issues with the solution have to do with the integration with different applications. It's not easy to connect ICAO to this kind of product. It would be better to work on the extensions of the adapters for this kind of identity management solution in order to not put in the code in the product."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."
"The solution needs to improve its web interface in the next release."
"It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability."
"The user interface experience needs to be improved."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 7th in Identity Management (IM) with 52 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 66 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Saviynt and ForgeRock. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
