We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The two-step authentication provides a higher level of security."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution."
"The web feature is quite versatile. It serves as the sole server authenticator and is valuable not only with FortiGate products but also within the entire Forti system, making it highly useful for me."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"It reduces the need for network administrator intervention by allowing the user to perform their own registration and resolve their own password problems and issues."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"The technical support team is bad."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"It has taken years to implement."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix and IBM Trusteer.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.