We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"I work a lot with Fortinet products and I call the support often. They are very quick to respond and the support is very good."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy. It is also easy to deploy."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"We have a perpetual license for 2FA."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance."
"I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"Scalable and stable."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"The solution could be more automated. It should be able to let me automate a lot of things so that what normally is done as a matter of manual processes can be handled quicker. Slow integrations can be taken up/out if there was more automation."
"If you want some other FortiAuthenticator from one site to another site, you should have requirements, but really if you have authentication and directory or another solution, you should change the password of the authenticator between the solution and the directory and other things. So transfer of data and other information should be simpler."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
"No SMS gateway from the ISP"
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"Lacks a simplified two-factor authentication process."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"We have issues with HA (high availability). These should be addressed in future releases."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"The stability could improve."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.