We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and WSO2 Identity Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution."
"FortiAuthenticator is easy to use."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy. It is also easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"It's very easy to implement everything."
"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."
"The keystore feature has been most valuable for us."
"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."
"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."
"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."
"Comprehensive ecosystem."
"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."
"No SMS gateway from the ISP"
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
"I would like to see more support from Fortinet with tech support people who have as much expertise on the authenticator as they do on their firewalls."
"FortiAuthenticator's interface could be better."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services"
"The high availability architecture has to be improved."
"The solution could improve its development from a user perspective."
"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."
"I found the initial setup to be very complex."
"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."
"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."
"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 50 reviews while WSO2 Identity Server is ranked 6th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 7 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Identity Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Identity Server writes "Provides valuable API management features, but its technical documentation needs improvement". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiNAC and Cisco Duo, whereas WSO2 Identity Server is most compared with Auth0, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Amazon Cognito, SailPoint IdentityIQ and SAP Identity Management.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.