We performed a comparison between FortiCache [EOL] and Ipanema IpIengine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with .
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.