FortiCache [EOL] vs M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FortiCache [EOL] and M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Filtering Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."
  • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Web Content Filtering
    Unranked
    In Web Content Filtering
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Filtering
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Trustwave
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Trustwave Web Filtering is a granular policy-based solution that monitors and blocks access to offensive or potentially harmful sites. ITrustwave Web Filtering monitors web requests and matches those against a database of inappropriate categories or URL keywords, which provides depth and control over policies. Organizations can add more than 100 custom categories. Administrators can create policies based on individuals, groups, containers or workstations and provides management with tools to enforce an organization's acceptable-use policies and limits legal liabilities resulting from exposure to inappropriate or offensive web content. Trustwave Web Filtering includes a mobile security client and the product permits real-time and forensic reporting via a centrally managed tool
    Sample Customers
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Crest Savings Bank
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Filtering
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Filtering while M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Filtering. FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4, while M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with , whereas M86 Web Content Filtering [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.