FortiCache [EOL] vs Noction IRP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Noction Logo
207 views|92 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FortiCache [EOL] and Noction IRP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."
  • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    8th
    out of 15 in WAN Optimization
    Views
    207
    Comparisons
    92
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Noction Intelligent Routing Platform is designed to improve the performance and reduce operational costs of a multi-homed BGP network. By adding intelligence to internet routing decisions, Noction IRP leverages a company’s existing internet connectivity to deliver substantial network performance improvements.

    Sample Customers
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Hivelocity, Wiredtree, Datapipe, ATE, UK2 Group, Steadfast, WebNX, TirePoint, Bandwidth.com, TETN, DQE Communications, OFFISTE
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Noction IRP is ranked 8th in WAN Optimization. FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Noction IRP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Noction IRP is most compared with Steelhead.

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.