Fortify Application Defender vs. Kiuwan

As of March 2019, Fortify Application Defender is ranked 18th in Application Security with 1 review vs Kiuwan which is ranked 6th in Application Security with 7 reviews. The top reviewer of Fortify Application Defender writes "Its ability to find security defects is valuable. However, support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking". The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Supports continuous integration tools". Fortify Application Defender is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity and Checkmarx. Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode and Checkmarx.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2019.
324,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Its ability to find security defects is valuable.

Read more »

I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance.​We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities.Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP.I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable.

Read more »

Cons
Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking.

Read more »

Perhaps more languages supported.The development-to-delivery phase.DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on.I would like to see additional languages supported.The QA developer and security could be improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did.Nothing special. It's a very fair model.Check with your account manager.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
324,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
Views
911
Comparisons
828
Reviews
1
Followers
63
Avg. Rating
7.0
6th
Views
5,870
Comparisons
3,314
Reviews
10
Followers
137
Avg. Rating
9.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender
Learn
Micro Focus
Kiuwan
Overview
Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Offer
Learn more about Fortify Application Defender
Learn more about Kiuwan
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2019.
324,339 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email