Compare Fortify WebInspect vs. PortSwigger Burp

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,854 views|37,366 comparisons
Fortify WebInspect Logo
7,420 views|5,135 comparisons
PortSwigger Burp Logo
20,988 views|17,692 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify WebInspect vs. PortSwigger Burp and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution."

More Veracode Pros »

"Technical support has been good.""I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level.""It's a well-known platform for doing dynamic application scanning.""It is scalable and very easy to use.""The most valuable feature is the static analysis.""The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use.""The accuracy of its scans is great.""The solution is able to detect a wide range of vulnerabilities. It's better at it than other products."

More Fortify WebInspect Pros »

""The product is very good just the way it is; It has everything already well established and functions great. I can't see any way for this current version to be improved."""This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives.""This solution has helped a lot in finding bugs and vulnerabilities, and the scanner is good enough for simple web apps.""Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them.""The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues.""BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding.""Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it.""The suite testing models are very good. It's very secure."

More PortSwigger Burp Pros »

Cons
"Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive."

More Veracode Cons »

"The initial setup was complex.""I'm not sure licensing, but on the pricing, it's a bit costly. It's a bit overpriced. Though it is an enterprise tool, there are other tools also with similar functionalities.""The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective.""The installation could be a bit easier. Usually it's simple to use, but the installation is painful and a bit laborious and complex.""Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved.""It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved.""Our biggest complaint about this product is that it freezes up, and literally doesn't work for us.""Lately, we've seen more false negatives."

More Fortify WebInspect Cons »

"The Initial setup is a bit complex.""There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual.""The scanner and crawler need to be improved.""I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory.""The number of false positives need to be reduced on the solution.""The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors.""The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired.""The solution doesn't offer very good scalability."

More PortSwigger Burp Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand.""Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

More Fortify WebInspect Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees.""Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year.""The yearly cost is about $300.""There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable.""Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition.""There are different licenses available that include a free version.""At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool.""PortSwigger is reasonably-priced. It's fair."

More PortSwigger Burp Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: The user interface is ok and it is very simple to use.
Top Answer: The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand.
Top Answer: There were times when we had to run the login sequence several times in order to capture it properly. It took us between… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price.
Top Answer: The Burp Collaborator needs improvement. There also needs to be improved integration.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 76% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspectBurp
Learn
Veracode
Micro Focus
PortSwigger
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Most enterprises rely heavily on the Web to conduct their normal operations, whether providing services, a mechanism for retail sales, or a host of other functions. Yet, most still struggle with efficiently managing their application security risks. For one thing, they need solutions of scale that can be used to manage thousands of active sites and assessments while also tracking discovered vulnerabilities, retesting procedures, and more. They need to perform repeated security tests to address compliance with regulations, legislation, and internal security policies and also see how their risk posture has changed over time. The enterprises have to protect their data, brand, and bottom line from the harsh impacts of what successful vulnerability exploitation could bring. Micro Focus WebInspect Enterprise enables organizations to solve these security problems quickly, efficiently, and intelligently.

Burp Suite is an integrated platform for performing security testing of web applications. Its various tools work seamlessly together to support the entire testing process, from initial mapping and analysis of an application's attack surface, through to finding and exploiting security vulnerabilities.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Fortify WebInspect
Learn more about PortSwigger Burp
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerAaron'sMaven Security Consulting, OWASP Italy, Penetration Testing Firm
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Engineering Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government12%
Financial Services Firm4%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company50%
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company10%
University10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise70%
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise63%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify WebInspect vs. PortSwigger Burp and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fortify WebInspect is ranked 13th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 9 reviews while PortSwigger Burp is ranked 3rd in Application Security Testing (AST) with 17 reviews. Fortify WebInspect is rated 7.0, while PortSwigger Burp is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortify WebInspect writes "Great centralized dashboard but is a bit overpriced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp writes "Great design, excellent features like Intruder, Repeater, Decoder with plenty of plug-ins from community forums". Fortify WebInspect is most compared with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, OWASP Zap, HCL AppScan, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner and Qualys Web Application Scanning, whereas PortSwigger Burp is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, HCL AppScan, Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner and Qualys Web Application Scanning. See our Fortify WebInspect vs. PortSwigger Burp report.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.