FortiGate-VM vs Kerio Control

FortiGate-VM is ranked 13th in Firewalls with 9 reviews vs Kerio Control which is ranked 17th in Firewalls with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of FortiGate-VM writes "Can use the appliance as a WLAN controller for up to 10 access points". The top reviewer of Kerio Control writes "The solution is easy to use and provides the ability to deliver customized solutions". FortiGate-VM is most compared with pfSense, Juniper SRX and Kerio Control. Kerio Control is most compared with pfSense, Sophos UTM and Fortinet FortiGate. See our FortiGate-VM vs Kerio Control report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate-VM vs Kerio Control and others in Firewalls.
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing FortiGate-VM vs Kerio Control

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It is very useful to make lists for rules and prepare firewall rules.The customer care center of Fortinet is good. For all the requests that we have done, they work as fast as possible, so this is a good point for Fortinet.​There is an interesting possibility of building a tunnel to a firewall from access points. We use this feature for small branch offices with one to two employees with access to central RDP servers.One top feature is the ability to use the appliance as a WLAN controller for up to 10 access points with the new 5.6 firmware.A top feature is the really good web interface and the classic Fortinet features, such as IPS, IDS, AV scanner, and spam filter.​Initial setup was quite straightforward, as we can simply head to the required sections to apply the planned network.​We use it to ensure that our network is properly protected from viruses and malware.The initial setup was quite straightforward.

Read more »

It has helped our organization with testing.Kerio Control is easy to use and provides the ability to deliver customized solutions.​It helps us better control internal and external communications.​​Setup is simple. The Kerio interface is very intuitive.​Its support is very good, and it is stable product.​

Read more »

Cons
The price is sometimes very expensive.​In the first two releases of FortiOS 5.6, we had some trouble with the SSL VPN service. Sometimes it stopped working, and the IPS daemon too.Improvements are needed for the responsive UI and JIT traffic reporting.The management tools should be more user-friendly.We encountered scalability issues in IPSec Module. The tunnels freeze sometimes.There were challenges during setup, and many of them were self-inflicted.The user interface (UI) and the performance of interface both need improvement.We have experience stability issues, when the product sizing is wrong or on configuration errors.

Read more »

They should improve the remote connectivity feature for users.Support responses need improvement.I would like for there to be a difference between international and national links.Filtering of pages and greater personalization in services need improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price: It is a bit higher than the other competitors. This is why I started to look at other brands.​The basic pricing in Austria is OK, but asking for special offers, e.g., NPOs, NGOs, trade up, and/or trade in, is always useful.​The price is expensive compared with other vendors, like Cisco and Huawei.The best part of Fortinet is the license is bundled together, so it is easy to use and apply.The pricing and licensing are not as expensive as its competitors.​It is on par with what you receive. It can be expensive upfront.It would be nice to have the ability to extend FortiGuard subscriptions at a reasonable yearly cost versus a bulk three year pricing.​It is an expensive solution if you are migrating from an open source solution.

Read more »

Search and compare.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
1,391
Comparisons
983
Reviews
9
Followers
65
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
11,496
Comparisons
7,319
Reviews
2
Followers
324
Avg. Rating
10.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more FortiGate-VM competitors »
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
See more Kerio Control competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsFortiGate Virtual Appliance
Website/Video
Website/VideoFortinet
GFI
Overview
Overview

FortiGate Virtual Appliances allow you to mitigate blind spots by implementing critical security controls within your virtual infrastructure. They also allow you to rapidly provision security infrastructure whenever and wherever it is needed. FortiGate virtual appliances feature all of the security and networking services common to traditional hardware-based FortiGate appliances. With the addition of virtual appliances from Fortinet, you can deploy a mix of hardware and virtual appliances, operating together and managed from a common centralized management platform.

Kerio Control brings together next-generation firewall capabilities -- including a network firewall and router, intrusion detection and prevention (IPS), gateway anti-virus, VPN, and web content and application filtering. These comprehensive capabilities and unmatched deployment flexibility make Kerio Control the ideal choice for small and mid-sized businesses.

OFFER
Learn more about FortiGate-VM
Learn more about Kerio Control
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersSecurity7 Networks, COOPENAETriton Technical, McDonald's
Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate-VM vs Kerio Control and others in Firewalls.
Download now
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email