Most Helpful Review
Features we most use are the SD-WAN and auto failover for dual ISP connections. Seem to work in harsh environments...
It is very useful to make lists for rules and prepare firewall rules.
The customer care center of Fortinet is good. For all the requests that we have done, they work as fast as possible, so this is a good point for Fortinet.
There is an interesting possibility of building a tunnel to a firewall from access points. We use this feature for small branch offices with one to two employees with access to central RDP servers.
One top feature is the ability to use the appliance as a WLAN controller for up to 10 access points with the new 5.6 firmware.
A top feature is the really good web interface and the classic Fortinet features, such as IPS, IDS, AV scanner, and spam filter.
Initial setup was quite straightforward, as we can simply head to the required sections to apply the planned network.
We use it to ensure that our network is properly protected from viruses and malware.
The initial setup was quite straightforward.
Point-to-point VPNs can dynamically follow IP changes with no need for static IPs.
Dual WAN connections are greatly simplified and point-to-point VPNs automatically connect regardless of what WAN connection is active.
It is very easy to configure.
It is very fast to implement.
In a week, we can make new policy and view what all our users did.
The dashboard is very intuitive and easy to understand.
Simple to manage.
Real Auto VPN with load balancer without needing a public IP. It is simple and functional.
The price is sometimes very expensive.
In the first two releases of FortiOS 5.6, we had some trouble with the SSL VPN service. Sometimes it stopped working, and the IPS daemon too.
Improvements are needed for the responsive UI and JIT traffic reporting.
The management tools should be more user-friendly.
We encountered scalability issues in IPSec Module. The tunnels freeze sometimes.
There were challenges during setup, and many of them were self-inflicted.
The user interface (UI) and the performance of interface both need improvement.
We have experience stability issues, when the product sizing is wrong or on configuration errors.
Meraki tech support staff have a lot more visibility into your network than you do, which is frustrating at times. I understand the approach is to keep the dashboard easier to understand. This will frustrate more advanced users at times.
We could have more reporting options and the ability to send alarms to the administrator.
More detail needed for configuration of the VPN.
It would be great if the Meraki devices let us see, in real time, the internet demand on a single device.
The only stability issue is in Content Filtering. Sometimes we need to report these types of issues to Cisco support.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The price: It is a bit higher than the other competitors. This is why I started to look at other brands.
The basic pricing in Austria is OK, but asking for special offers, e.g., NPOs, NGOs, trade up, and/or trade in, is always useful.
The price is expensive compared with other vendors, like Cisco and Huawei.
The best part of Fortinet is the license is bundled together, so it is easy to use and apply.
The pricing and licensing are not as expensive as its competitors.
It is on par with what you receive. It can be expensive upfront.
It would be nice to have the ability to extend FortiGuard subscriptions at a reasonable yearly cost versus a bulk three year pricing.
It is an expensive solution if you are migrating from an open source solution.
Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution.
It is more expensive than other solutions, but it is a cloud-managed network solution and support is given at the moment you call. That give a very big plus.
The Meraki UTM is excellent when you buy the Advanced Security license. If you buy a different license you lost all the valuable functions.
It can always improve pricewise regarding throughput.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
See more FortiGate-VM competitors »
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
See more Meraki MX Firewalls competitors »
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
|Also Known As||FortiGate Virtual Appliance||MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600|
FortiGate Virtual Appliances allow you to mitigate blind spots by implementing critical security controls within your virtual infrastructure. They also allow you to rapidly provision security infrastructure whenever and wherever it is needed. FortiGate virtual appliances feature all of the security and networking services common to traditional hardware-based FortiGate appliances. With the addition of virtual appliances from Fortinet, you can deploy a mix of hardware and virtual appliances, operating together and managed from a common centralized management platform.
|With the proliferation of modern applications and mixed-use networks, host and port based security is no longer sufficient. Cisco Meraki's layer 7 "next generation" firewall, included in MX security appliances and every wireless AP, gives administrators complete control over the users, content, and applications on their network.|
Learn more about FortiGate-VM
Learn more about Meraki MX Firewalls
|Sample Customers||Security7 Networks, COOPENAE||Hyatt, ONS|
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS