We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Impulse Point SafeConnect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."Fortinet FortiNAC is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are user device management and there are plenty of policies."
"All the features of Fortinet FortiNAC are valuable."
"With FortiNAC, we don't need to configure the mass client site or access points. For example, we don't need to configure the switching site for a client's site. With Persistent Agent, it makes it much easier."
"The features are more expandable."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with all other Fortinet solutions."
"Fortinet FortiNAC offers several valuable features, including data security, 99 percent uptime with VPN connections, MAC filtering, and traffic prioritization."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"It is very easy to scale the product."
"Integration is hard in Fortinet FortiNAC, but they are evolving and getting better. For example, with Cisco, Aruba, Huawei, and Extreme devices, Fortinet FortiNAC is working properly, but some other devices have problems."
"The technical support is bad. We've had to escalate to Tier 2 and Tier 3. My customer relationship manager on the other side of this has stopped returning phone calls and emails, because there has been such a constant back and forth."
"The automation in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"Fortinet's local support could be improved."
"The reporting capability needs to be improved."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"The interface works fine, but it could be better."
"The deployment of Fortinet FortiNAC could be better. When we are deploying the solution we have some level of dependencies with other vendors for their connection to Fortinet FortiNAC. Without these dependencies, it would be better."
"The solution would be much better if it offered self-service onboarding."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 42 reviews while Impulse Point SafeConnect is ranked 17th in Network Access Control (NAC). Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Impulse Point SafeConnect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Impulse Point SafeConnect writes "Easy to scale, enforces policies well, and has responsive technical support". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Fortinet FortiClient, whereas Impulse Point SafeConnect is most compared with Forescout Platform.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.