Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. IBM QRadar and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.
One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful.
Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.
Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.
The log analysis and reporting are both quite good.
The most valuable features are customizing reports, and the ability to drill down to display critical information in real-time.
The program is stable and it gives me great visibility.
It has a simplified and user-friendly interface.
It is a simple and solution.
The IBS (Intent Based Segmentation) and application web filtering are the most valuable aspects of the solution.
The feature I find most useful is the handy dashboard.
We use this functionality every day, and obtain reports on things like how many people are using the VPN, which websites are being accessed, and whether hackers are trying to penetrate into our network.
Providing real-time visibility for threat detection and prioritization - QRadar SIEM provides contextual and actionable surveillance across the entire IT infrastructure.
The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good.
It is very stable. We have not faced interruptions in the past four and a half years.
It has improved comprehensive visibility for what is going on in the perimeters, and on the inside, as well.
This solution has allowed us to correlate logs from multiple sources.
We get events and make the correlation, or rules. In IBM, we can implement our customer's rules. We can have very clear status threats and severity of antigens.
Provided that the report is prebuilt and I can find what I am looking for, the reporting is the most valuable feature in this solution.
This solution provides me with various alarms, and I have found security issues with some of my other products.
The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc.
There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.
Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.
The solution lacks business intelligence features. It's much too basic.
The reports are good, but they are over-summarized.
The technical support is not very good.
When it comes to pushing logs to a SIEM, most of the time we have some issues when it comes to filtering.
I'm looking for something more efficient to analyze different foreign things. That's why FortiSIEM could compete with FortiAnalyzer.
The solution could use more graphics and be more specific in the dashboard. This way, I'm able to understand everything and effectively understand what's going on, including what's incoming and outgoing. Right now, I have to look up everything. I need a dashboard so that I can see specific items right there in one place.
I would like to see an improvement in the technical support. Stronger authentication will also be a plus.
When somebody is new to the system they find it difficult to perform certain operations, like backups, and to see where the reports are.
AI is superb but need improvements.
I would like to see a better GUI.
Technical support is good, but not great.
We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow.
The interface is very old. IBM should remake it into a more modern interface.
There are reports that I would like to generate that are either not included, or I cannot find.
There is a lot of manual configuration required in order for the product to run smoothly, and I think that it could be made more automatic.
It is very difficult to activate all of the network equipment, and it would help if it were made easier.
Pricing and Cost Advice
I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.
We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.
It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.
The pricing of this solution is fair, and it is based on what you can manage.
The program is expensive.
The price is quite expensive. Fortinet products are very expensive. That is something which they should also look at, because if you compare Fortinet product to, say, Sophos for example, Fortinet is really high and that's the only thing which is a drawback for most users.
We have around 12 devices and yearly we spend approximately $14,000.
All Fortinet programs come at a good price.
We have several products including Fortinet Wireless, FortiGate Firewalls, and FortiAnalyzer, which are bundled together and cost approximately $50,000 USD annually.
The pricing needs to be such that they are more competitive with other vendors.
There are additional costs, such as the cost associated with the different hardware required for implementation and deployment. Along with the add-on apps, these are all additional costs, and they require licensing as well.
In terms of additional costs, it depends on the subscription that you choose. There are plenty of options to choose from.
Our licensing costs for this solution is on a yearly basis.
It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows.
QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business...
I would like for them to lower the price.
The pricing is good.
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
|Logtrust||QRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar|
Devo unlocks the full value of machine data for the world’s most instrumented enterprises by putting more data to work now. With Devo, IT executives finally realize the transformational promise of machine data to drive breakthrough projects that move the entire business forward.
|FortiAnalyzer Network Security Logging, Analysis, and Reporting Appliances securely aggregate log data from Fortinet Security Appliances. A comprehensive suite of easily customable reports allows you to quickly analyze and visualize network threats, inefficiencies and usage. FortiAnalyzer is one of several versatile Fortinet Management Products that provide a diversity of deployment types, growth flexibility, advanced customization through APIs and simple licensing.|
The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability.
With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.
See Devo in Action
See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.
Learn more about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
Learn more about IBM QRadar
|NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, Public Library of Science, OpenText||General Directorate of Information Technology||Clients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.|
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm26%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company6%
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider17%
See our list of best Log Management vendors.