We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management."The IBS (Intent Based Segmentation) and application web filtering are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"What I like the most is the monitoring system."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is to be able to see everything in our network in a single task. A single menu and the graphical bar charts that it provides to give insights are very useful. It also gives very good metrics on bandwidth utilization, CPU, and device performance. It is very simple and easy to use as well."
"We use this functionality every day, and obtain reports on things like how many people are using the VPN, which websites are being accessed, and whether hackers are trying to penetrate into our network."
"The event handling solution in the platform is very good and useful."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to create a customized dashboard."
"The solution is easy to use and easy to integrate."
"The solution allows for a lot of customization."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"The solution can improve the incident response function to provide more detailed information on where the incident is originating."
"Fortinet FortiAnalyzer should come bundled with other Fortinet solutions. Additionally, the performance and updates could improve. They need to test their updates better so there are not as many bugs."
"The reports are good, but they are over-summarized."
"I think some improvement is required in real-time log monitoring, as sometimes it gets stuck or displays results after a delay."
"When somebody is new to the system they find it difficult to perform certain operations, like backups, and to see where the reports are."
"The solution could improve by allowing the ability to search logs in integrated solutions."
"Pricing-wise, it not affordable for the normal customer. Most of the people want to see different types of reporting, but FortiAnalyzer's fee is a little bit difficult."
"The interface or GUI does not work properly on Microsoft Edge. The behavior or the view is different on Microsoft Edge versus on Chrome or Firefox. When some buttons do not work, I am forced to switch to Firefox."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is ranked 8th in Log Management with 81 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 54th in Log Management. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is rated 8.0, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer writes "We can automate event-based handling solutions, is stable, and is great for heavy traffic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Graylog, Grafana Loki and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.