We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator does not pass the locks."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility in using the SMS messages."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"We use this product for SSL two-factor authentication and FortiToken management."
"The current version is stable...Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution"
"The feature I value the most is the one-time passwords because it helps to authenticate users so you know the timing of their usage."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."
"For improvement, Fortinet needs to ensure that they provide quick support to users...Fortinet sometimes needs to respond to users facing issues within an hour."
"We would like to see Linux-based operating systems be able to integrate with FortiAuthenticator to get two-factor authentication running on them. as well. This is a shortcoming that I have faced a few times already."
"Integration with FortiGate could be more fluid."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services"
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"They should have a landing page."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Auth0 and Keeper.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.