We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution is easy to learn and makes it easy for our users to add FortiToken. It's very easy to integrate if you have other Fortinet devices."
"The web feature is quite versatile. It serves as the sole server authenticator and is valuable not only with FortiGate products but also within the entire Forti system, making it highly useful for me."
"Features the addition and removal of access as needed for the VPN."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"The most valuable features are the performance and ease of use."
"The product enables SSO."
"The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"Scalable and stable."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"The product must provide full support for third-party FIDO security keys."
"I would like to see some email options for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"The customization capability of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is not very flexible."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
"The stability could improve."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.