Compare Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Symantec Siteminder

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action.""The initial setup is so easy and there is no problem in the implementation.""The feature I value the most is the one-time passwords because it helps to authenticate users so you know the timing of their usage.""The solution's most valuable aspect is that it easy to install. The user experience is very good.""The solution is easy to learn and makes it easy for our users to add FortiToken. It's very easy to integrate if you have other Fortinet devices.""For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product.""We use this product for SSL two-factor authentication and FortiToken management.""The logs have great detail that make it easier to evaluate and control the security environment."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory.""The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature""Symantec Siteminder Is both scalable and stable.""The solution is easy to use for our managers."

More Symantec Siteminder Pros »

Cons
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc.""If you want some other FortiAuthenticator from one site to another site, you should have requirements, but really if you have authentication and directory or another solution, you should change the password of the authenticator between the solution and the directory and other things. So transfer of data and other information should be simpler.""I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform.""The hardware aspect of the solution could be improved. We are not really able to understand the hardware capabilities of the device.""We have issues with HA (high availability). These should be addressed in future releases.""No SMS gateway from the ISP""It does the job I paid for, but the graphical interface could be improved.""It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Cons »

"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly.""We're currently unable to find information about if the solution can do a full implementation with SQL. Some better and more accessible documentation for new users or those curious about the product would be helpful.""Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved.""The technical support could be better."

More Symantec Siteminder Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You can pay as you go with them. You purchase a base license and add to it as needed.""The product could be more competitively priced.""It costs more to license the high-availability option.""The licensing structure is cost-effective for us compared to some of the other solutions that have recurring monthly costs.""FAC is an affordable solution for Middle Range (200E/400E) and also needs a package of mobility agents (2,000) perpetual."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price.""The licensing is fair for this solution."

More Symantec Siteminder Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It reduces the need for network administrator intervention by allowing the user to perform their own registration and resolve their own password problems and issues.
Top Answer: FAC is an affordable solution for Middle Range (200E/400E) and also needs a package of mobility agents (2,000) perpetual. There is nothing to buy in the gateways (FG) and it is fully integrated.
Top Answer: I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios. Specifically, with web applications… more »
Top Answer: The solution is easy to use for our managers.
Top Answer: Some of the new protocols, like OAuth 2.0, could be improved. It would be nice to see a better cloud-based solution that's both easy and accessible for all organizations.
Ranking
2nd
Views
8,629
Comparisons
6,025
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
527
Rating
8.2
7th
Views
3,654
Comparisons
2,591
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
365
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FortiAuthenticator
Single Sign-On, SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder
Learn More
Overview

FortiAuthenticator user identity management appliances strengthen enterprise security by simplifying and centralizing the management and storage of user identity information.

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Learn more about Symantec Siteminder
Sample Customers
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Marketing Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company25%
Government5%
Manufacturing Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm41%
Comms Service Provider8%
Healthcare Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise10%
REVIEWERS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise3%
Large Enterprise93%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 2nd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 13 reviews while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 7th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.2, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "Cost-effective and users can be securely managed by adopting it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Provides centralized and secure policy management on a large scale". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Duo Security, Okta Workforce Identity and Azure Active Directory, whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, PingID, Azure Active Directory, ForgeRock and PingAccess. See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.