We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The first valuable feature is being able to see everything on one platform. This includes logs and authentication failure."
"Valuable features include the robust SSO features, when you have more complicated authentication within an organization. We can mix AD, Radius, Portal, SSO Portals (Google, etc.), and build our own environment. It is very flexible."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"For someone concerned with multifactor authentication, I'm satisfied with the product."
"We have a perpetual license for 2FA."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."
"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."
"Scalable and stable."
"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."
"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."
"We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"The hardware aspect of the solution could be improved. We are not really able to understand the hardware capabilities of the device."
"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive."
"I would like to see more ways to authenticate, such as adding facial recognition to the two-factor, where you log into your phone or another device."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"The stability could improve."
"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 50 reviews while Thales Authenticators is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 4 reviews. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0, while Thales Authenticators is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales Authenticators writes "Responsive support, effective authentication, but stability could improve". Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiNAC and Cisco Duo, whereas Thales Authenticators is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Atalla Hardware Security Module and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.