We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiClient are ease of use and simple configuration."
"It seems to be more scalable than we thought."
"There is a lot of documentation available online."
"The solution offers great stability."
"Compared to other similar solutions, it is faster in connecting."
"The initial setup of this solution is easy."
"What I like most about FortiClient is that it's easy to use. The way it displays information is very straightforward."
"We like its centralized administration, integration with Active Directory, deployment, and stability of the connection."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"The platform is easy to use."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The quality and response time of the support team must be improved."
"We'd like to be able to properly encrypt the data more effectively."
"Compatibility issues between different versions."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"Fortinet FortiClient could improve the compatibility with mobile applications that are allowed and sometimes they do not respond. However, Microsoft Windows applications are very good."
"The pricing could use improvement."
"FortiClient is not great in Linux."
"The documentation could be improved."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 16th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 5 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server, AWS Direct Connect and Symantec VIP Access Manager. See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.