Compare Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Kerio Control

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA Firewall Logo
70,706 views|51,770 comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate-VM Logo
5,489 views|3,778 comparisons
Kerio Control Logo
11,749 views|9,017 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Jonathan LELOU
Dhsrms Fff
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Kerio Control and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"At this point, we find that this product has high productivity and high availability and there is no need for improvement.""It is a highly stable product. We rarely receive any serious outdates, so it works quite well.""It is a secure product.""It is scalable and stable.""Cisco ASA is very strong.""It protects our network.""The stability of the product is good.""It is a comprehensive suite and complete package."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pros »

"It handles our current load with ease, and I think it can handle a bit more. It definitely can handle a lot more capacity than we currently use.""FortiGate is a nice and very good product.""The product is quite user-friendly so we didn't have a lot of issues that needed to be addressed.""The standard features, including the filtering, are quite good. All the basic features are pretty useful for us.""The most valuable features are site-to-site connections and UTM.""The stability of the solution is good. We haven't faced any issues at all while using the product.""The most valuables features are the ease of use and deployment.""In terms of administration, it's perfect."

More Fortinet FortiGate-VM Pros »

"Technical support is good. They respond right away.""Kerio has improved my organization's security.""The statistic feature enables us to better use bandwidth management. We monitored the use by mobile, type of application, department, and by users. The bandwidth was solid. Our internet speed is optimized for our research.""The flexibility of the system, the capacity to provide the right level of security, and the ability to be integrated into different kinds of infrastructures are the most valuable features.""The most valuable feature is to provide users with the ability to log in to the portal page, keep track of their data usage and perform bandwidth management.""All of the features of Kerio Control are equally good. Most valuable to us are the firewall rules, the intrusion detection system, and IP address features.""What I like the most about Kerio is that I can use the software appliance as a solution, so if the hardware fails for any reason then I can quickly replace it with hardware that I have in stock.""It prevents people from visiting undesirable sites and ensures that they use the internet for their designated jobs."

More Kerio Control Pros »

Cons
"<p>If there is old hardware, or appliances, it does not necessarily work with the new Cisco generation firewalls.""It is not easy to configure.""The scalability is a bit limiting, to be honest. In terms of when you look to changing landscape in terms of threats, I think to me, my personal it's a bit limiting.""Tech support could not answer all of our questions. I had to do research on the web to solve my issues.""Migration with other appliances is not easy. It has to be done manually, and this takes a long time.""The pricing is a bit high.""Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.""Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Cons »

"The GUI could be improved.""FortiGate should be more customer friendly and budgeted better.""Customization needs improvement.""We haven't attempted to scale the solution just yet. If we want to scale this solution we may have to look at other models. With certain requirements, we probably wouldn't be able to scale it so well as it is right now.""When new versions are deployed they tend to be a little buggy, so they should be more fully tested before release.""The user interface needs to be improved.""In the next release, we would like to see full integration with VMware NSX virtualized networks.""The interface needs to be updated and simplified."

More Fortinet FortiGate-VM Cons »

"I would like to see them develop a bit more flexibility creating VLANs.""They should add wireless features.""I would like for them to add more security features.""The improvement that we are looking for is for when decide to move some part of our application to the cloud.""I would like to be able to inspect https packets for the purpose of virus scanning.""Kerio Control has just improved on their biggest problem, which was to introduce better support for high-availability requirements in production.""Their support is getting better but still needs improvement.""Improvements are needed to the Next Generation Firewall Protection, specifically with user-level protection."

More Kerio Control Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost is a bit higher than other competitive solutions on the market.""It is considered on the "high end" of the spectrum.""Cisco recently has become very expensive.""The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.""Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.""It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.""Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.""With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this product is great compared to others.""This solution is very expensive.""The price is similar to Symantec Endpoint, but it's more expensive than Forcepoint solutions. Fortinet is better than Forcepoint.""There is a benefit in terms of the cost of using this solution because the price is very good.""It's not a cheap solution but it comes with its benefits."

More Fortinet FortiGate-VM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is good, but the licensing took a lot of time.""The price is inexpensive.""It's very affordable.""The pricing is in-line with our expectations in terms of the quality that we get for it.""There is a yearly upkeep fee.""My advice is to use your own hardware, and do not use theirs.""It is priced low enough for entry-level, but it has the power to grow with a company without them having to replace it.""The biggest advice that I could probably give people is when you buy the solution be prepared to either buy the unlimited license or buy more licenses than you think. Each user license gives you one employee and each a user gives you five devices. In the world nowadays where everybody has a cellphone, tablet, desktop, and laptop, that's four devices. You still get one more device per person. That covers your servers and back-ends."

More Kerio Control Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Fortinet FGs: Great devices, relatively easy to deploy and maintain. Cheaper than most devices of their kind. If you're… more »
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Top Answer: The functionality provided is very good.
Top Answer: Fortigate is cheaper if you compare it to Palo Alto, a main competitor.
Top Answer: As we just began implementing the solution, I'm not sure if there are any features missing. We haven't come across any… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAvFortiGate Virtual Appliance, FortiGate-VM
Learn
Cisco
Fortinet
GFI
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

FortiGate Virtual Appliances allow you to mitigate blind spots by implementing critical security controls within your virtual infrastructure. They also allow you to rapidly provision security infrastructure whenever and wherever it is needed. FortiGate virtual appliances feature all of the security and networking services common to traditional hardware-based FortiGate appliances. With the addition of virtual appliances from Fortinet, you can deploy a mix of hardware and virtual appliances, operating together and managed from a common centralized management platform.

Kerio Control brings together next-generation firewall capabilities -- including a network firewall and router, intrusion detection and prevention (IPS), gateway anti-virus, VPN, and web content and application filtering. These comprehensive capabilities and unmatched deployment flexibility make Kerio Control the ideal choice for small and mid-sized businesses.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about Fortinet FortiGate-VM
Learn more about Kerio Control
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Security7 Networks, COOPENAETriton Technical, McDonald's
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company9%
University7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company6%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Media Company18%
Healthcare Company9%
Maritime Company9%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company28%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company21%
Transportation Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Non Tech Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider38%
Computer Software Company19%
Media Company6%
Government5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise41%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise48%
REVIEWERS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise20%
REVIEWERS
Small Business87%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise3%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Kerio Control and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fortinet FortiGate-VM is ranked 15th in Firewalls with 20 reviews while Kerio Control is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 32 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate-VM is rated 8.0, while Kerio Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate-VM writes "Clearly captures each and every thing for the backup capture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kerio Control writes "Through the ease of how quickly we could roll out the VPN to everybody, we had whole companies remotely working overnight". Fortinet FortiGate-VM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, Azure Firewall and Juniper SRX, whereas Kerio Control is most compared with pfSense, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM, Sophos XG and Untangle NG Firewall. See our Fortinet FortiGate-VM vs. Kerio Control report.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.