We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Compliance checks are a good feature. Compliance check is for windows updates and for antivirus updates, etc."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are access control, automation, artificial intelligence, analysis, and security, and it is a unified solution. You can combine a lot of features within the solution."
"It's easy to connect to a VPN without any hassles."
"The features are more expandable."
"Provides containment and security and and carries out file analysis for cyber theft."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to protect devices connected to network service."
"With FortiNAC, we don't need to configure the mass client site or access points. For example, we don't need to configure the switching site for a client's site. With Persistent Agent, it makes it much easier."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"They need to change or upgrade the technology in the product."
"The course content could be improved, it's not that simple to work through."
"The implementation process needs improvement. Right now, it's somewhat complicated. They could create some templates to facilitate implementation. Right now everything is done manually, and it just takes a really long time at the initial setup."
"This solution could be more agile."
"I think the network devices need to give more information."
"The user interface and the product's intuitiveness could be improved."
"For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 42 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Twingate, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.